Dubai Telegraph - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 4.256969
AFN 73.026624
ALL 95.949668
AMD 436.29849
ANG 2.074968
AOA 1062.937298
ARS 1612.956254
AUD 1.648622
AWG 2.089361
AZN 1.97515
BAM 1.955793
BBD 2.330592
BDT 141.989509
BGN 1.981339
BHD 0.437098
BIF 3425.188147
BMD 1.159146
BND 1.479895
BOB 7.995972
BRL 6.159011
BSD 1.157196
BTN 108.180626
BWP 15.778945
BYN 3.510788
BYR 22719.261378
BZD 2.327292
CAD 1.591102
CDF 2637.057544
CHF 0.913917
CLF 0.027244
CLP 1075.745893
CNY 7.982348
CNH 8.005172
COP 4253.385281
CRC 540.49813
CUC 1.159146
CUP 30.717369
CVE 110.264618
CZK 24.515015
DJF 206.059287
DKK 7.48519
DOP 68.689762
DZD 153.294785
EGP 59.995792
ERN 17.38719
ETB 182.369469
FJD 2.566871
FKP 0.868888
GBP 0.86899
GEL 3.147128
GGP 0.868888
GHS 12.613956
GIP 0.868888
GMD 85.201694
GNF 10142.964899
GTQ 8.863969
GYD 242.099162
HKD 9.082199
HNL 30.628894
HRK 7.547552
HTG 151.809475
HUF 393.739159
IDR 19654.711213
ILS 3.60393
IMP 0.868888
INR 108.971952
IQD 1515.894754
IRR 1525001.44174
ISK 144.047519
JEP 0.868888
JMD 181.799371
JOD 0.82188
JPY 184.582853
KES 149.909481
KGS 101.364887
KHR 4623.983998
KMF 494.955743
KPW 1043.265709
KRW 1744.874492
KWD 0.35536
KYD 0.964297
KZT 556.328075
LAK 24848.914008
LBP 103633.441366
LKR 360.978751
LRD 211.759267
LSL 19.520632
LTL 3.422657
LVL 0.701156
LYD 7.407974
MAD 10.813063
MDL 20.15193
MGA 4824.983303
MKD 61.639787
MMK 2432.834089
MNT 4136.040892
MOP 9.340468
MRU 46.32084
MUR 53.912319
MVR 17.920835
MWK 2006.593056
MXN 20.746631
MYR 4.565921
MZN 74.073751
NAD 19.520632
NGN 1572.092184
NIO 42.579853
NOK 11.093021
NPR 173.089401
NZD 1.985179
OMR 0.445696
PAB 1.157196
PEN 4.000686
PGK 4.994983
PHP 69.723065
PKR 323.078682
PLN 4.282755
PYG 7557.973845
QAR 4.231485
RON 5.101986
RSD 117.449594
RUB 96.003268
RWF 1683.694173
SAR 4.352195
SBD 9.33305
SCR 15.877645
SDG 696.647132
SEK 10.831104
SGD 1.486609
SHP 0.86966
SLE 28.486057
SLL 24306.724357
SOS 661.297712
SRD 43.45349
STD 23991.981659
STN 24.499915
SVC 10.124965
SYP 128.330532
SZL 19.526932
THB 38.14522
TJS 11.114462
TMT 4.068602
TND 3.417588
TOP 2.790945
TRY 51.295112
TTD 7.850973
TWD 37.135217
TZS 3008.589588
UAH 50.693025
UGX 4373.984863
USD 1.159146
UYU 46.629839
UZS 14107.951178
VES 527.05282
VND 30499.449254
VUV 137.764445
WST 3.161931
XAF 655.95473
XAG 0.017051
XAU 0.000257
XCD 3.13265
XCG 2.085493
XDR 0.815797
XOF 655.95473
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.576393
ZAR 19.85325
ZMK 10433.709028
ZMW 22.593922
ZWL 373.244535
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • RYCEF

    -1.2600

    15.34

    -8.21%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

C.Masood--DT