Dubai Telegraph - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 4.178425
AFN 72.81666
ALL 92.194529
AMD 413.599766
ANG 2.037005
AOA 1044.463357
ARS 1734.78838
AUD 1.620158
AWG 2.047967
AZN 1.945353
BAM 1.956719
BBD 2.291828
BDT 140.09705
BGN 1.915351
BHD 0.428905
BIF 3409.406656
BMD 1.13776
BND 1.454447
BOB 13.932729
BRL 5.920695
BSD 1.13791
BTN 109.154721
BWP 15.557514
BYN 3.44437
BYR 22300.086814
BZD 2.288405
CAD 1.611867
CDF 2662.357254
CHF 0.946314
CLF 0.027923
CLP 1102.682485
CNY 7.638064
CNH 7.638588
COP 3764.470828
CRC 516.776853
CUC 1.13776
CUP 27.30903
CVE 110.318768
CZK 24.395038
DJF 202.617863
DKK 7.475092
DOP 67.744804
DZD 152.282248
EGP 59.260549
ERN 17.066393
ETB 185.423058
FJD 2.545962
FKP 0.858799
GBP 0.857888
GEL 2.975222
GGP 0.858799
GHS 13.238394
GIP 0.858799
GMD 83.626005
GNF 10006.789246
GTQ 8.690159
GYD 238.084994
HKD 8.925524
HNL 30.544619
HRK 7.53868
HTG 148.916507
HUF 367.191429
IDR 20492.186919
ILS 3.485458
IMP 0.858799
INR 109.154431
IQD 1490.513359
IRR 1564234.471704
ISK 136.975326
JEP 0.858799
JMD 180.124624
JOD 0.806614
JPY 178.51904
KES 147.569886
KGS 99.495362
KHR 4618.230579
KMF 492.650043
KPW 1023.98394
KRW 1544.684891
KWD 0.351396
KYD 0.948258
KZT 500.379481
LAK 25530.331003
LBP 101893.313885
LKR 376.623562
LRD 195.704524
LSL 18.698049
LTL 3.359508
LVL 0.688219
LYD 7.278547
MAD 10.957441
MDL 20.116716
MGA 4991.410823
MKD 61.59894
MMK 2389.107877
MNT 4091.464196
MOP 9.194041
MRU 45.581815
MUR 54.00907
MVR 17.578419
MWK 1973.052973
MXN 20.213425
MYR 4.644787
MZN 72.714316
NAD 18.698049
NGN 1511.217335
NIO 41.870039
NOK 10.813585
NPR 174.652729
NZD 2.007036
OMR 0.437458
PAB 1.13785
PEN 3.866486
PGK 5.147509
PHP 71.044555
PKR 315.267558
PLN 4.372683
PYG 6683.139809
QAR 4.147449
RON 5.277842
RSD 117.523774
RUB 96.159383
RWF 1680.011436
SAR 4.273326
SBD 9.102659
SCR 15.709784
SDG 684.36749
SEK 11.319922
SGD 1.453783
SHP 0.859011
SLE 28.04559
SLL 23858.239254
SOS 650.348411
SRD 42.856556
STD 23549.325171
STN 24.513132
SVC 9.955765
SYP 14793.149715
SZL 18.693357
THB 38.192287
TJS 10.49657
TMT 3.993536
TND 3.369483
TOP 2.739452
TRY 55.73019
TTD 7.722832
TWD 36.141497
TZS 3015.06047
UAH 51.059088
UGX 4454.170913
USD 1.13776
UYU 45.612231
UZS 13443.552238
VES 969.862007
VND 29552.734946
VUV 134.029322
WST 3.123967
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.01847
XAU 0.000273247002
XCD 3.074852
XCG 2.050681
XDR 0.804455
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 269.25065
ZAR 18.652327
ZMK 10241.198729
ZMW 22.159703
ZWL 366.358105
SSP 6499.555885
MXV 2.289118
  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    20.19

    -0.54%

  • BCE

    -0.4150

    20.555

    -2.02%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    20.34

    -0.29%

  • BCC

    -0.8640

    76.276

    -1.13%

  • RBGPF

    -1.5200

    64.47

    -2.36%

  • RIO

    -0.8600

    93.7

    -0.92%

  • GSK

    0.3160

    49.556

    +0.64%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0700

    19.6

    -0.36%

  • RELX

    -0.3100

    33.21

    -0.93%

  • BTI

    0.2750

    55.905

    +0.49%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • JRI

    -0.1500

    10.87

    -1.38%

  • BP

    0.8900

    45.04

    +1.98%

  • NGG

    -0.4650

    75.025

    -0.62%

  • VOD

    -0.0080

    16.612

    -0.05%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

C.Masood--DT