Dubai Telegraph - Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say

EUR -
AED 4.185561
AFN 75.79615
ALL 93.944644
AMD 416.64149
AOA 1045.109397
ARS 1703.679015
AUD 1.628918
AWG 2.051469
AZN 1.941354
BAM 1.958816
BBD 2.296235
BDT 140.626518
BHD 0.429962
BIF 3405.944029
BMD 1.139705
BND 1.471666
BOB 12.660493
BRL 5.793579
BSD 1.140055
BTN 110.032414
BWP 15.748247
BYN 3.270035
BYR 22338.213469
BZD 2.29293
CAD 1.605217
CDF 2575.732664
CHF 0.929651
CLF 0.027408
CLP 1078.719497
CNY 7.718195
CNH 7.711904
COP 3668.322151
CRC 518.798779
CUC 1.139705
CUP 30.202176
CVE 110.435033
CZK 24.137832
DJF 203.012572
DKK 7.475711
DOP 66.392222
DZD 152.036085
EGP 58.447027
ERN 17.095572
ETB 184.010916
FJD 2.565819
FKP 0.855462
GBP 0.853667
GEL 2.991686
GGP 0.855462
GHS 13.258414
GIP 0.855462
GMD 84.337787
GNF 10002.400392
GTQ 8.697391
GYD 238.517238
HKD 8.937622
HNL 30.536015
HRK 7.537435
HTG 149.059502
HUF 360.546704
IDR 20467.957943
ILS 3.47194
IMP 0.855462
INR 110.058497
IQD 1493.499496
IRR 1567094.05738
ISK 143.021352
JEP 0.855462
JMD 180.828416
JOD 0.808067
JPY 186.431196
KES 147.587842
KGS 99.667226
KHR 4610.098028
KMF 494.632232
KRW 1664.482008
KWD 0.3534
KYD 0.950063
KZT 542.0646
LAK 25814.746181
LBP 102091.987934
LKR 383.119878
LRD 206.347707
LSL 19.255948
LTL 3.365252
LVL 0.689396
LYD 7.295232
MAD 10.676438
MDL 20.150024
MGA 5051.778069
MKD 61.669951
MMK 2393.379184
MNT 4096.094824
MOP 9.208879
MRU 45.502058
MUR 54.044921
MVR 17.608531
MWK 1976.843686
MXN 19.873659
MYR 4.654782
MZN 72.82441
NAD 19.255948
NGN 1558.60362
NIO 41.954596
NOK 10.914776
NPR 176.052062
NZD 1.964144
OMR 0.438405
PAB 1.140055
PEN 3.879774
PGK 5.099852
PHP 70.327781
PKR 316.678881
PLN 4.313857
PYG 6892.612346
QAR 4.144581
RON 5.226798
RSD 117.571021
RUB 88.963104
RWF 1679.88647
SAR 4.288141
SBD 9.210074
SCR 15.370087
SDG 684.381918
SEK 11.030376
SGD 1.469165
SLE 27.609377
SOS 651.5031
SRD 43.07229
STD 23589.58766
STN 24.53778
SVC 9.975359
SZL 19.253644
THB 38.328083
TJS 10.516993
TMT 3.988967
TND 3.379203
TRY 53.971976
TTD 7.745926
TWD 36.854976
TZS 3010.558676
UAH 51.092065
UGX 4297.61691
USD 1.139705
UYU 45.780487
UZS 13797.243196
VES 844.864738
VND 29997.029516
VUV 135.252306
WST 3.141391
XAF 656.968514
XAG 0.0191
XAU 0.000278
XCD 3.080109
XCG 2.054664
XDR 0.817058
XOF 656.968514
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.876395
ZAR 19.048251
ZMK 10258.709666
ZMW 21.119517
ZWL 366.984471
  • CMSC

    -0.0650

    21.725

    -0.3%

  • VOD

    -0.1000

    15.15

    -0.66%

  • RIO

    -0.2900

    91.22

    -0.32%

  • BTI

    1.1200

    60.96

    +1.84%

  • GSK

    0.6100

    51.35

    +1.19%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    18.17

    -1.05%

  • RBGPF

    -0.7300

    66

    -1.11%

  • NGG

    -0.0700

    82.3

    -0.09%

  • RELX

    1.5500

    34.41

    +4.5%

  • CMSD

    -0.0200

    21.98

    -0.09%

  • AZN

    0.9900

    169.26

    +0.58%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    13.06

    +1.23%

  • BCC

    1.3800

    77.84

    +1.77%

  • BP

    -0.1100

    43.82

    -0.25%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    21.3

    +0.42%

Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say
Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say / Photo: TIMOTHY A. CLARY - AFP

Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say

As governments around the world struggle with ways to reverse plunging birth rates, new US studies suggest they have ignored a key culprit -- the smartphone.

Text size:

"Is the iPhone Birth Control?" asked a paper published Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, delving into why US fertility rates have fallen by 22 percent since 2007.

For a while, experts linked the decline to the recession that struck in 2008 when the global financial system nearly imploded, driving millions of people into hardship. But when the economy picked up, a rebound in births never came.

Myriad other reasons have been posited, such as increased use of contraception, more female education, and growing housing or childcare costs. However, no clear cause has been established.

So Middlebury College economist Caitlin Myers and her student Ezekiel Hooper tested a hypothesis that smartphones -- which emerged with the arrival of the first iPhone in 2007 -- might have something to do with it.

Until 2011, iPhones were available from a single US cellular network, AT&T, so they compared US counties that had near-universal AT&T coverage with those that had little or none during those years.

And they found that access to the iPhone correlated with reductions in births by 4.5–8.0 percent at ages 15–19 and by 3.2–6.6 percent at ages 20–24.

There were also statistically significant but smaller declines among older women.

While they stress that iPhones are not the "sole cause," the introduction of the smartphone "played a sizable role in the decline in US births" after 2007 as it shaped people's behavior with less in-person contact.

"As modern smartphones diffused, time spent with friends in person and sexual activity fell sharply alongside rising consumption of pornography, a possible substitute for partnered sex," they concluded.

- 'Technology shock' -

Another study published in May by University of Cincinnati economists Nathan Hudson and Hernan Moscoso Boedo found evidence of similar trends and on a global scale since 2007.

They analyzed World Bank data measuring smartphone penetration and teenage fertility rates in 128 countries.

They found that the decline in birth rates accelerated once smartphones became widely available -- a phenomenon found across countries "with fundamentally different healthcare, welfare, economic, and cultural environments."

This, they concluded, points to "a common global technology shock."

Some academics remain skeptical. For example, teenage births in the United States have been falling since the early 1990s, long before the dawn of the smartphone.

Neither study examines how governments might utilize their findings.

Both rich and poorer countries are grappling with declining birth rates which lead to aging societies and a shrinking workforce -- putting strain on social security systems and potentially dampening economic growth and productivity.

The Centers for Disease Control says US fertility rates are at an all-time low, while leading Asian economies all face the prospect of shrinking populations in the coming years.

China's communist government abandoned its decades-long one-child policy in 2016, while Japan and South Korea have invested heavily in pro-natal policies with little impact.

The world's poorest countries, such as in sub-Saharan Africa, often still have high birth rates, but middle-income countries like India and Brazil also face a fast-dropping fertility rates.

D.Naveed--DT