Dubai Telegraph - Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin

EUR -
AED 4.39647
AFN 79.010777
ALL 96.7817
AMD 453.834235
ANG 2.142963
AOA 1097.770504
ARS 1728.714548
AUD 1.697422
AWG 2.154839
AZN 2.03606
BAM 1.959479
BBD 2.410826
BDT 146.2646
BGN 2.010429
BHD 0.451359
BIF 3555.483592
BMD 1.197133
BND 1.514243
BOB 8.270527
BRL 6.218144
BSD 1.196947
BTN 110.127756
BWP 15.609305
BYN 3.381248
BYR 23463.797441
BZD 2.40732
CAD 1.614512
CDF 2702.527156
CHF 0.914657
CLF 0.026043
CLP 1028.337353
CNY 8.318156
CNH 8.313415
COP 4373.125105
CRC 592.211831
CUC 1.197133
CUP 31.724012
CVE 110.884406
CZK 24.328187
DJF 212.75416
DKK 7.467485
DOP 75.419599
DZD 154.65435
EGP 56.059366
ERN 17.956988
ETB 186.200377
FJD 2.621956
FKP 0.868641
GBP 0.866784
GEL 3.226251
GGP 0.868641
GHS 13.114581
GIP 0.868641
GMD 88.00166
GNF 10476.106643
GTQ 9.184243
GYD 250.420144
HKD 9.344996
HNL 31.588305
HRK 7.535923
HTG 156.894557
HUF 380.549872
IDR 20097.400931
ILS 3.704161
IMP 0.868641
INR 109.934056
IQD 1568.04388
IRR 50429.2077
ISK 144.996855
JEP 0.868641
JMD 187.812603
JOD 0.848796
JPY 183.318702
KES 154.514154
KGS 104.688869
KHR 4816.661042
KMF 493.218172
KPW 1077.499653
KRW 1713.586906
KWD 0.366789
KYD 0.997473
KZT 601.288873
LAK 25747.338611
LBP 102474.544325
LKR 370.335275
LRD 221.435728
LSL 18.885656
LTL 3.534821
LVL 0.724134
LYD 7.519117
MAD 10.83945
MDL 20.132798
MGA 5357.167785
MKD 61.629467
MMK 2514.472536
MNT 4270.0428
MOP 9.623167
MRU 47.746641
MUR 54.05048
MVR 18.507873
MWK 2075.496582
MXN 20.615098
MYR 4.704817
MZN 76.329328
NAD 18.885656
NGN 1661.703631
NIO 44.052706
NOK 11.415096
NPR 176.204811
NZD 1.969152
OMR 0.460301
PAB 1.196947
PEN 4.002915
PGK 5.201766
PHP 70.529025
PKR 334.819598
PLN 4.205952
PYG 8032.0796
QAR 4.363392
RON 5.097505
RSD 117.394378
RUB 90.079313
RWF 1746.378689
SAR 4.490097
SBD 9.670049
SCR 16.594223
SDG 720.018515
SEK 10.539112
SGD 1.512703
SHP 0.898159
SLE 29.091786
SLL 25103.269553
SOS 682.882058
SRD 45.495226
STD 24778.226215
STN 24.546083
SVC 10.473663
SYP 13239.776792
SZL 18.879445
THB 37.386326
TJS 11.179589
TMT 4.189964
TND 3.427835
TOP 2.882408
TRY 52.027807
TTD 8.124253
TWD 37.561827
TZS 3070.644609
UAH 51.226874
UGX 4257.99405
USD 1.197133
UYU 45.295038
UZS 14565.345295
VES 429.143458
VND 31125.445585
VUV 143.139968
WST 3.252382
XAF 657.190824
XAG 0.010137
XAU 0.00022
XCD 3.23531
XCG 2.15725
XDR 0.816474
XOF 657.190824
XPF 119.331742
YER 285.394994
ZAR 18.826046
ZMK 10775.631872
ZMW 23.669438
ZWL 385.476184
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    82.4

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0392

    24.09

    +0.16%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    80.3

    -0.68%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    23.71

    +0.04%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1700

    16.43

    -1.03%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.94

    -0.39%

  • NGG

    0.3900

    85.07

    +0.46%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    14.71

    +0.95%

  • BCE

    0.2200

    25.49

    +0.86%

  • RIO

    1.7600

    95.13

    +1.85%

  • RELX

    -1.2100

    36.17

    -3.35%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    50.66

    +1.11%

  • BTI

    0.0600

    60.22

    +0.1%

  • AZN

    -0.6300

    92.59

    -0.68%

  • BP

    0.3400

    38.04

    +0.89%

Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin
Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin / Photo: Hector RETAMAL - AFP/File

Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin

An animal market in China's Wuhan really was the epicenter of the Covid pandemic, according to a pair of new studies in the journal Science published Tuesday that claimed to have tipped the balance in the debate about the virus' origins.

Text size:

Answering the question of whether the disease spilled over naturally from animals to humans, or was the result of a lab accident, is viewed as vital to averting the next pandemic and saving millions of lives.

The first paper analyzed the geographic pattern of Covid cases in the outbreak's first month, December 2019, showing the first cases were tightly clustered around the Huanan Market.

The second examined genomic data from the earliest cases to study the virus' early evolution, concluding it was unlikely the coronavirus circulated widely in humans prior to November 2019.

Both were previously posted as "preprints" but have now been vetted by scientific peer review and appear in a prestigious journal.

Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona, who co-authored both papers, had previously called on the scientific community in a letter to be more open to the idea that the virus was the result of a lab leak.

But the findings moved him "to the point where now I also think it's just not plausible that this virus was introduced any other way than through the wildlife trade at the Wuhan market," he told reporters on a call about the findings.

Though previous investigation had centered on the live animal market, researchers wanted more evidence to determine it was really the progenitor of the outbreak, as opposed to an amplifier.

This required neighborhood-level study within Wuhan to be more certain the virus was "zoonotic" -- that it jumped from animals to people.

The first study's team used mapping tools to determine the location of the first 174 cases identified by the World Health Organization, finding 155 of them were in Wuhan.

Further, these cases clustered tightly around the market -- and some early patients with no recent history of visiting the market lived very close to it.

Mammals now known to be infectable with the virus -- including red foxes, hog badgers and raccoon dogs, were all sold live in the market, the team showed.

- Two introductions to humans -

They also tied positive samples from patients in early 2020 to the western portion of the market, which sold live or freshly butchered animals in late 2019.

The tightly confined early cases contrasted with how it radiated throughout the rest of the city by January and February, which the researchers confirmed by drilling into social media check-in data from the Weibo app.

"This tells us the virus was not circulating cryptically," Worobey said in a statement. "It really originated at that market and spread out from there."

The second study focused on resolving an apparent discrepancy in the virus' early evolution.

Two lineages, A and B, marked the early pandemic.

But while A was closer to the virus found in bats, suggesting the coronavirus in humans came from this source and that A gave rise to B, it was B that was found to be far more present around the market.

The researchers used a technique called "molecular clock analysis," which relies on the rate at which genetic mutations occur over time to reconstruct a timeline of evolution -- and found it unlikely that A gave rise to B.

"Otherwise, lineage A would have had to have been evolving in slow motion compared to the lineage B virus, which just doesn't make biological sense," said Worobey.

Instead, the probable scenario was both jumped from animals at the market to humans on separate occasions, in November and December 2019. The researchers concluded it was unlikely that there was human circulation prior to November 2019.

Under this scenario, there were probably other animal-to-human transmissions at the market that failed to manifest as Covid cases.

"Have we disproven the lab leak theory? No, we have not. Will we ever be able to know? No," said co-author Kristian Anderson of The Scripps Research Institute.

"But I think what's really important here is that there are possible scenarios and they're plausible scenarios and it's really important to understand that possible does not mean equally likely."

T.Jamil--DT