Dubai Telegraph - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.400314
AFN 77.881147
ALL 96.814682
AMD 454.172547
ANG 2.144834
AOA 1098.729057
ARS 1730.745379
AUD 1.690809
AWG 2.158218
AZN 2.042821
BAM 1.959124
BBD 2.414607
BDT 146.498583
BGN 2.012185
BHD 0.451686
BIF 3551.270346
BMD 1.198178
BND 1.512786
BOB 8.284057
BRL 6.227767
BSD 1.198839
BTN 110.119313
BWP 15.686617
BYN 3.408698
BYR 23484.290754
BZD 2.411101
CAD 1.620506
CDF 2683.918435
CHF 0.917625
CLF 0.026186
CLP 1033.955485
CNY 8.33291
CNH 8.319544
COP 4397.74497
CRC 595.019577
CUC 1.198178
CUP 31.75172
CVE 110.45288
CZK 24.298095
DJF 213.48135
DKK 7.46704
DOP 75.429249
DZD 154.714803
EGP 56.109364
ERN 17.972671
ETB 186.414713
FJD 2.618439
FKP 0.869432
GBP 0.866031
GEL 3.229063
GGP 0.869432
GHS 13.103234
GIP 0.869432
GMD 87.466656
GNF 10519.982279
GTQ 9.197645
GYD 250.81559
HKD 9.348245
HNL 31.637684
HRK 7.534031
HTG 156.996396
HUF 379.901498
IDR 20117.410294
ILS 3.70231
IMP 0.869432
INR 110.191403
IQD 1570.47137
IRR 50473.252638
ISK 144.787493
JEP 0.869432
JMD 187.928883
JOD 0.849516
JPY 183.431525
KES 154.589225
KGS 104.78044
KHR 4819.23774
KMF 493.649685
KPW 1078.290613
KRW 1708.440222
KWD 0.367097
KYD 0.999099
KZT 604.037467
LAK 25827.933287
LBP 107356.012463
LKR 371.221447
LRD 221.78726
LSL 19.062325
LTL 3.537908
LVL 0.724766
LYD 7.528744
MAD 10.839493
MDL 20.104197
MGA 5349.076452
MKD 61.600431
MMK 2516.151613
MNT 4280.660921
MOP 9.634588
MRU 47.858006
MUR 54.097074
MVR 18.523892
MWK 2078.827408
MXN 20.521616
MYR 4.695675
MZN 76.395464
NAD 19.062325
NGN 1673.830778
NIO 44.115408
NOK 11.440744
NPR 176.1907
NZD 1.969217
OMR 0.460694
PAB 1.198834
PEN 4.011306
PGK 5.131772
PHP 70.569096
PKR 335.375273
PLN 4.204707
PYG 8050.626917
QAR 4.358915
RON 5.095247
RSD 117.400304
RUB 91.721686
RWF 1749.067864
SAR 4.49358
SBD 9.678495
SCR 17.176644
SDG 720.702641
SEK 10.541367
SGD 1.511975
SHP 0.898944
SLE 29.118971
SLL 25125.194783
SOS 683.960562
SRD 45.640962
STD 24799.867551
STN 24.541951
SVC 10.489843
SYP 13251.340431
SZL 19.054412
THB 37.190847
TJS 11.203157
TMT 4.193623
TND 3.428532
TOP 2.884925
TRY 52.020807
TTD 8.136841
TWD 37.52634
TZS 3043.372756
UAH 51.245655
UGX 4292.283258
USD 1.198178
UYU 45.36717
UZS 14504.672432
VES 429.518272
VND 31224.521278
VUV 143.387393
WST 3.265465
XAF 657.071937
XAG 0.010054
XAU 0.000214
XCD 3.238136
XCG 2.160575
XDR 0.817187
XOF 657.06919
XPF 119.331742
YER 285.649307
ZAR 18.761325
ZMK 10785.036009
ZMW 23.826529
ZWL 385.812859
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    82.4

    0%

  • CMSD

    -0.0457

    24.0508

    -0.19%

  • BTI

    -0.1800

    60.16

    -0.3%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    80.85

    -1.1%

  • GSK

    -0.7000

    50.1

    -1.4%

  • BCE

    -0.2500

    25.27

    -0.99%

  • CMSC

    -0.1000

    23.7

    -0.42%

  • RELX

    -0.9800

    37.38

    -2.62%

  • AZN

    -2.3800

    93.22

    -2.55%

  • NGG

    0.3700

    84.68

    +0.44%

  • RIO

    0.4600

    93.37

    +0.49%

  • BP

    0.0800

    37.7

    +0.21%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5500

    16.6

    -3.31%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    14.57

    +0.48%

  • JRI

    -0.6900

    12.99

    -5.31%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

I.Menon--DT