Dubai Telegraph - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.218957
AFN 74.661225
ALL 91.582971
AMD 417.457719
ANG 2.056463
AOA 1054.440663
ARS 1743.614232
AUD 1.610725
AWG 2.06753
AZN 1.957227
BAM 1.958584
BBD 2.314189
BDT 141.100567
BGN 1.933647
BHD 0.43308
BIF 3445.883141
BMD 1.148628
BND 1.468274
BOB 11.289342
BRL 5.906291
BSD 1.149053
BTN 110.098541
BWP 15.582625
BYN 3.475741
BYR 22513.103189
BZD 2.310945
CAD 1.607792
CDF 2654.479062
CHF 0.944284
CLF 0.027911
CLP 1102.062801
CNY 7.693107
CNH 7.700293
COP 3657.609688
CRC 514.039631
CUC 1.148628
CUP 30.438634
CVE 110.55587
CZK 24.347696
DJF 204.134569
DKK 7.475389
DOP 67.81758
DZD 153.643935
EGP 60.011386
ERN 17.229416
ETB 187.686889
FJD 2.545249
FKP 0.860671
GBP 0.857505
GEL 2.990867
GGP 0.860671
GHS 13.237162
GIP 0.860671
GMD 84.42856
GNF 10101.666796
GTQ 8.768617
GYD 240.39904
HKD 9.011042
HNL 30.845651
HRK 7.534658
HTG 150.176082
HUF 364.287725
IDR 20459.4717
ILS 3.487958
IMP 0.860671
INR 110.252582
IQD 1505.265866
IRR 1578903.655694
ISK 139.202636
JEP 0.860671
JMD 181.437904
JOD 0.814422
JPY 180.197158
KES 148.759217
KGS 100.447935
KHR 4656.761237
KMF 491.613064
KPW 1033.765308
KRW 1592.044397
KWD 0.353962
KYD 0.95759
KZT 513.710212
LAK 25757.976881
LBP 102859.612165
LKR 380.330553
LRD 198.788625
LSL 18.680779
LTL 3.391599
LVL 0.694794
LYD 7.294223
MAD 10.886907
MDL 20.194321
MGA 4981.210628
MKD 61.619198
MMK 2411.765202
MNT 4134.326493
MOP 9.2846
MRU 46.225512
MUR 54.640655
MVR 17.746733
MWK 1992.492937
MXN 19.78965
MYR 4.690656
MZN 73.40923
NAD 18.680942
NGN 1529.662418
NIO 42.280099
NOK 10.809019
NPR 176.162473
NZD 2.008793
OMR 0.442789
PAB 1.149063
PEN 3.877412
PGK 5.114426
PHP 72.2606
PKR 318.484727
PLN 4.363465
PYG 6811.860614
QAR 4.19998
RON 5.263476
RSD 117.119869
RUB 96.935341
RWF 1687.950767
SAR 4.280492
SBD 9.18961
SCR 16.157873
SDG 690.903792
SEK 11.290555
SGD 1.465768
SHP 0.858627
SLE 28.314099
SLL 24086.139517
SOS 656.64482
SRD 43.585257
STD 23774.274604
STN 24.535303
SVC 10.054598
SYP 14934.457826
SZL 18.674871
THB 38.295672
TJS 10.59989
TMT 4.031683
TND 3.380004
TOP 2.76562
TRY 56.015171
TTD 7.800223
TWD 36.503811
TZS 3043.85889
UAH 51.337638
UGX 4532.442628
USD 1.148628
UYU 46.207089
UZS 13604.57507
VES 973.444877
VND 29889.590367
VUV 135.872884
WST 3.164265
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.01734
XAU 0.000262
XCD 3.104224
XCG 2.070844
XDR 0.812139
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.708303
ZAR 18.687948
ZMK 10339.031894
ZMW 22.584693
ZWL 369.857655
SSP 6505.853316
MXV 2.243593
  • RBGPF

    -1.6900

    68.3

    -2.47%

  • RYCEF

    0.7100

    20

    +3.55%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    20.71

    +0.19%

  • RIO

    -0.6700

    97.37

    -0.69%

  • NGG

    -0.8000

    76.8

    -1.04%

  • VOD

    -0.5700

    16.95

    -3.36%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    22.06

    -1%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    166.08

    -0.04%

  • RELX

    -0.9700

    33.41

    -2.9%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    20.45

    0%

  • GSK

    -0.8400

    50.22

    -1.67%

  • BTI

    -0.1900

    55.83

    -0.34%

  • BP

    -0.8400

    44.58

    -1.88%

  • JRI

    -0.0600

    11.55

    -0.52%

  • BCC

    0.1600

    75.69

    +0.21%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

I.Menon--DT