Dubai Telegraph - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.210618
AFN 73.378016
ALL 94.569878
AMD 421.465916
ANG 2.052746
AOA 1052.512333
ARS 1663.642959
AUD 1.634988
AWG 2.066615
AZN 1.917679
BAM 1.955642
BBD 2.308513
BDT 140.688622
BGN 1.938641
BHD 0.432254
BIF 3417.823599
BMD 1.146527
BND 1.47978
BOB 7.920394
BRL 5.920786
BSD 1.146207
BTN 108.048435
BWP 15.576333
BYN 3.184742
BYR 22471.934685
BZD 2.305124
CAD 1.622611
CDF 2637.012921
CHF 0.924881
CLF 0.026218
CLP 1031.622112
CNY 7.761191
CNH 7.783831
COP 3951.460409
CRC 519.957951
CUC 1.146527
CUP 30.382973
CVE 110.257045
CZK 24.227555
DJF 204.104384
DKK 7.474786
DOP 66.994582
DZD 153.043079
EGP 57.234527
ERN 17.197909
ETB 181.41802
FJD 2.575387
FKP 0.866674
GBP 0.86654
GEL 3.044059
GGP 0.866674
GHS 12.837018
GIP 0.866674
GMD 83.125684
GNF 10041.187965
GTQ 8.743293
GYD 239.761656
HKD 8.987358
HNL 30.66052
HRK 7.536927
HTG 149.717892
HUF 352.73943
IDR 20416.383251
ILS 3.396705
IMP 0.866674
INR 108.197607
IQD 1501.478575
IRR 1576761.641307
ISK 143.85439
JEP 0.866674
JMD 181.105354
JOD 0.812861
JPY 184.870683
KES 148.418068
KGS 100.264126
KHR 4596.508006
KMF 494.153364
KPW 1031.874953
KRW 1754.611072
KWD 0.353142
KYD 0.955098
KZT 559.34013
LAK 25313.063312
LBP 102638.847161
LKR 382.529065
LRD 208.60313
LSL 18.900572
LTL 3.385397
LVL 0.693523
LYD 7.310409
MAD 10.678836
MDL 20.240833
MGA 4825.630794
MKD 61.660668
MMK 2407.160628
MNT 4104.078481
MOP 9.253552
MRU 45.743301
MUR 54.884428
MVR 17.658804
MWK 1987.447941
MXN 19.882365
MYR 4.743417
MZN 73.274677
NAD 18.900572
NGN 1564.620224
NIO 42.176589
NOK 11.105841
NPR 172.882019
NZD 1.996895
OMR 0.440841
PAB 1.146212
PEN 3.878786
PGK 5.023594
PHP 69.63491
PKR 318.832316
PLN 4.261757
PYG 7038.492184
QAR 4.178299
RON 5.239859
RSD 117.41198
RUB 83.891655
RWF 1679.020284
SAR 4.298324
SBD 9.239056
SCR 15.647396
SDG 688.488856
SEK 10.97347
SGD 1.48031
SHP 0.855998
SLE 28.376814
SLL 24042.107996
SOS 655.047026
SRD 42.844614
STD 23730.799864
STN 24.498019
SVC 10.029189
SYP 126.728065
SZL 18.895472
THB 37.680622
TJS 10.630687
TMT 4.012845
TND 3.386926
TOP 2.760563
TRY 53.250915
TTD 7.772405
TWD 36.242074
TZS 3009.667324
UAH 51.490236
UGX 4171.662636
USD 1.146527
UYU 45.826294
UZS 13810.883108
VES 695.520894
VND 30176.598006
VUV 136.03008
WST 3.155018
XAF 655.903957
XAG 0.017705
XAU 0.000276
XCD 3.098547
XCG 2.065633
XDR 0.806808
XOF 655.909677
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.870251
ZAR 18.891562
ZMK 10320.117783
ZMW 20.545428
ZWL 369.181316
  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

I.Menon--DT