Dubai Telegraph - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.224876
AFN 72.462986
ALL 96.160604
AMD 434.099231
ANG 2.058963
AOA 1054.738043
ARS 1606.038123
AUD 1.628909
AWG 2.073245
AZN 1.957787
BAM 1.959215
BBD 2.316138
BDT 141.107219
BGN 1.966056
BHD 0.434221
BIF 3416.109293
BMD 1.150205
BND 1.471035
BOB 7.974972
BRL 6.040894
BSD 1.150005
BTN 106.071837
BWP 15.680472
BYN 3.425836
BYR 22544.020924
BZD 2.312943
CAD 1.573084
CDF 2605.214492
CHF 0.906057
CLF 0.026511
CLP 1046.813004
CNY 8.001115
CNH 7.92826
COP 4260.842959
CRC 540.146332
CUC 1.150205
CUP 30.480436
CVE 111.13859
CZK 24.454509
DJF 204.414853
DKK 7.471767
DOP 70.564391
DZD 152.131445
EGP 60.230841
ERN 17.253077
ETB 181.013531
FJD 2.547595
FKP 0.868334
GBP 0.863925
GEL 3.128823
GGP 0.868334
GHS 12.519984
GIP 0.868334
GMD 84.515954
GNF 10093.05076
GTQ 8.814443
GYD 240.721742
HKD 9.006578
HNL 30.561304
HRK 7.539937
HTG 150.724067
HUF 391.404502
IDR 19517.831177
ILS 3.591441
IMP 0.868334
INR 106.132132
IQD 1506.768745
IRR 1519478.512409
ISK 143.211796
JEP 0.868334
JMD 180.895354
JOD 0.815474
JPY 183.113233
KES 148.840282
KGS 100.58578
KHR 4622.10278
KMF 493.437605
KPW 1035.184626
KRW 1714.570528
KWD 0.353216
KYD 0.958279
KZT 555.322921
LAK 24700.655091
LBP 103000.87101
LKR 358.097383
LRD 210.775166
LSL 19.277199
LTL 3.396257
LVL 0.695748
LYD 7.3728
MAD 10.806191
MDL 20.009056
MGA 4779.102216
MKD 61.709926
MMK 2415.019418
MNT 4107.710362
MOP 9.274449
MRU 46.140499
MUR 53.806333
MVR 17.782217
MWK 1997.906655
MXN 20.371795
MYR 4.520887
MZN 73.509782
NAD 19.277204
NGN 1571.67499
NIO 42.235365
NOK 11.132226
NPR 169.721992
NZD 1.964872
OMR 0.442264
PAB 1.150015
PEN 3.943482
PGK 4.948754
PHP 68.636185
PKR 321.223553
PLN 4.272265
PYG 7464.01199
QAR 4.190485
RON 5.09484
RSD 117.426723
RUB 93.449256
RWF 1678.149313
SAR 4.316316
SBD 9.261061
SCR 16.378688
SDG 691.272965
SEK 10.749024
SGD 1.470163
SHP 0.862952
SLE 28.293004
SLL 24119.239327
SOS 657.347107
SRD 43.214935
STD 23806.924333
STN 24.844431
SVC 10.06263
SYP 127.126407
SZL 19.277227
THB 37.243559
TJS 11.039641
TMT 4.031469
TND 3.35973
TOP 2.769417
TRY 50.804333
TTD 7.798663
TWD 36.812088
TZS 2996.284814
UAH 50.697321
UGX 4341.606456
USD 1.150205
UYU 46.751909
UZS 13923.233407
VES 513.274734
VND 30238.893372
VUV 137.524572
WST 3.146058
XAF 657.108248
XAG 0.014306
XAU 0.00023
XCD 3.108487
XCG 2.072531
XDR 0.819555
XOF 661.945035
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.323586
ZAR 19.240229
ZMK 10353.228016
ZMW 22.395236
ZWL 370.365589
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    16.4

    -0.91%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.94

    -0.22%

  • VOD

    0.2200

    14.63

    +1.5%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.56

    -0.24%

  • BCC

    2.2600

    72.26

    +3.13%

  • BCE

    0.6921

    25.94

    +2.67%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    22.95

    -0.17%

  • RIO

    2.2300

    90.06

    +2.48%

  • NGG

    -0.1000

    90.8

    -0.11%

  • RELX

    0.3700

    34.51

    +1.07%

  • BTI

    1.2850

    61.215

    +2.1%

  • AZN

    2.0400

    191.94

    +1.06%

  • BP

    0.4100

    43.08

    +0.95%

  • GSK

    0.7250

    54.115

    +1.34%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

I.Menon--DT