Dubai Telegraph - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.370669
AFN 78.547025
ALL 96.278273
AMD 450.622905
ANG 2.130388
AOA 1091.328986
ARS 1722.405317
AUD 1.696403
AWG 2.142194
AZN 2.027299
BAM 1.948242
BBD 2.397439
BDT 145.456903
BGN 1.998632
BHD 0.448652
BIF 3526.404033
BMD 1.190108
BND 1.507439
BOB 8.225227
BRL 6.216527
BSD 1.190302
BTN 109.307763
BWP 15.571644
BYN 3.390219
BYR 23326.113255
BZD 2.393953
CAD 1.609722
CDF 2686.669586
CHF 0.915437
CLF 0.025998
CLP 1026.336493
CNY 8.269346
CNH 8.273029
COP 4348.154126
CRC 589.42316
CUC 1.190108
CUP 31.537857
CVE 109.839785
CZK 24.336455
DJF 211.96123
DKK 7.467284
DOP 74.93895
DZD 154.05412
EGP 55.854602
ERN 17.851617
ETB 184.910124
FJD 2.613417
FKP 0.862744
GBP 0.866184
GEL 3.207311
GGP 0.862744
GHS 13.03963
GIP 0.862744
GMD 87.474037
GNF 10444.566682
GTQ 9.129733
GYD 249.028048
HKD 9.291725
HNL 31.417639
HRK 7.529934
HTG 155.774996
HUF 380.663726
IDR 19981.910283
ILS 3.677993
IMP 0.862744
INR 109.392866
IQD 1559.343768
IRR 50133.292068
ISK 144.991072
JEP 0.862744
JMD 186.526346
JOD 0.84382
JPY 183.952632
KES 153.523692
KGS 104.074336
KHR 4786.390347
KMF 490.324072
KPW 1071.195635
KRW 1717.629069
KWD 0.365042
KYD 0.991765
KZT 598.65749
LAK 25616.049626
LBP 106592.204903
LKR 368.1019
LRD 214.546736
LSL 18.899793
LTL 3.514079
LVL 0.719884
LYD 7.469085
MAD 10.797202
MDL 20.016559
MGA 5319.451876
MKD 61.630387
MMK 2499.281315
MNT 4245.956935
MOP 9.571785
MRU 47.493541
MUR 54.066684
MVR 18.387421
MWK 2064.02702
MXN 20.580588
MYR 4.691392
MZN 75.869455
NAD 18.899793
NGN 1652.869038
NIO 43.800805
NOK 11.394485
NPR 174.888761
NZD 1.960817
OMR 0.4576
PAB 1.190302
PEN 3.979727
PGK 5.095275
PHP 70.13127
PKR 333.014626
PLN 4.205883
PYG 7973.067429
QAR 4.339763
RON 5.098662
RSD 117.438673
RUB 90.603841
RWF 1736.335388
SAR 4.46358
SBD 9.59001
SCR 16.419937
SDG 715.847357
SEK 10.540451
SGD 1.510158
SHP 0.892889
SLE 29.00886
SLL 24955.965041
SOS 680.257991
SRD 45.284203
STD 24632.829038
STN 24.405725
SVC 10.414682
SYP 13162.086558
SZL 18.89362
THB 37.47471
TJS 11.111392
TMT 4.177278
TND 3.419932
TOP 2.865494
TRY 51.769455
TTD 8.081781
TWD 37.504815
TZS 3064.528011
UAH 51.016503
UGX 4255.561501
USD 1.190108
UYU 46.191183
UZS 14551.667152
VES 436.587186
VND 30871.396828
VUV 142.347093
WST 3.230425
XAF 653.416494
XAG 0.011999
XAU 0.000238
XCD 3.216326
XCG 2.145213
XDR 0.814683
XOF 653.427432
XPF 119.331742
YER 283.71971
ZAR 19.020916
ZMK 10712.396649
ZMW 23.359765
ZWL 383.214232
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    1.3800

    83.78

    +1.65%

  • BCC

    -0.9700

    79.2

    -1.22%

  • NGG

    -0.1000

    84.95

    -0.12%

  • GSK

    0.5050

    51.16

    +0.99%

  • CMSC

    -0.0050

    23.69

    -0.02%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    12.975

    +0.15%

  • BP

    0.1700

    38.21

    +0.44%

  • RIO

    -2.6200

    92.51

    -2.83%

  • BTI

    -0.3250

    59.885

    -0.54%

  • RELX

    -0.4350

    35.73

    -1.22%

  • BCE

    0.0700

    25.555

    +0.27%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    24.05

    -0.04%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4300

    16

    -2.69%

  • VOD

    -0.0600

    14.65

    -0.41%

  • AZN

    0.2650

    92.855

    +0.29%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

A.Ragab--DT