Dubai Telegraph - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.212777
AFN 72.835586
ALL 94.512843
AMD 422.248264
ANG 2.053494
AOA 1052.895931
ARS 1680.790338
AUD 1.635257
AWG 2.067368
AZN 1.95436
BAM 1.956354
BBD 2.309354
BDT 140.73988
BGN 1.939347
BHD 0.432422
BIF 3423.630825
BMD 1.146945
BND 1.480319
BOB 7.92328
BRL 5.90941
BSD 1.146625
BTN 108.087801
BWP 15.582008
BYN 3.185903
BYR 22480.122
BZD 2.305963
CAD 1.623185
CDF 2615.035015
CHF 0.925648
CLF 0.026299
CLP 1035.072439
CNY 7.764364
CNH 7.780559
COP 3960.034063
CRC 520.14739
CUC 1.146945
CUP 30.394043
CVE 110.569964
CZK 24.190336
DJF 203.835517
DKK 7.474072
DOP 66.986043
DZD 152.939427
EGP 57.331754
ERN 17.204175
ETB 181.647461
FJD 2.564
FKP 0.867567
GBP 0.866531
GEL 3.039852
GGP 0.867567
GHS 12.874504
GIP 0.867567
GMD 84.304874
GNF 10064.442782
GTQ 8.746478
GYD 239.84901
HKD 8.988436
HNL 30.606273
HRK 7.533254
HTG 149.77244
HUF 351.906109
IDR 20445.785654
ILS 3.394682
IMP 0.867567
INR 108.1919
IQD 1502.49795
IRR 1577049.375404
ISK 143.976448
JEP 0.867567
JMD 181.171337
JOD 0.813229
JPY 185.008009
KES 148.419043
KGS 100.300781
KHR 4599.249852
KMF 492.617229
KPW 1032.250901
KRW 1752.130969
KWD 0.353179
KYD 0.955446
KZT 559.543917
LAK 25295.872375
LBP 102708.92515
LKR 382.668433
LRD 208.916469
LSL 18.815678
LTL 3.386631
LVL 0.693776
LYD 7.311819
MAD 10.580612
MDL 20.248208
MGA 4817.169398
MKD 61.628611
MMK 2408.272435
MNT 4107.54883
MOP 9.256923
MRU 45.947051
MUR 54.881752
MVR 17.720734
MWK 1992.243861
MXN 19.872547
MYR 4.745948
MZN 73.301688
NAD 18.814173
NGN 1560.350288
NIO 41.990088
NOK 11.102662
NPR 172.945006
NZD 1.997675
OMR 0.441554
PAB 1.14663
PEN 3.881306
PGK 5.032508
PHP 69.638491
PKR 319.223511
PLN 4.259467
PYG 7041.056554
QAR 4.175458
RON 5.239364
RSD 117.183799
RUB 83.845404
RWF 1679.12748
SAR 4.299026
SBD 9.24601
SCR 15.693948
SDG 688.744688
SEK 10.98638
SGD 1.482316
SHP 0.85631
SLE 28.387314
SLL 24050.86738
SOS 655.483268
SRD 42.898615
STD 23739.445827
STN 24.544623
SVC 10.032843
SYP 126.774237
SZL 18.814083
THB 37.723444
TJS 10.63456
TMT 4.014308
TND 3.339618
TOP 2.761569
TRY 53.262066
TTD 7.775237
TWD 36.375404
TZS 3017.595134
UAH 51.508996
UGX 4173.182519
USD 1.146945
UYU 45.84299
UZS 13769.075108
VES 695.774297
VND 30176.12295
VUV 136.226685
WST 3.156058
XAF 656.142926
XAG 0.017685
XAU 0.000276
XCD 3.099677
XCG 2.066386
XDR 0.807102
XOF 648.024305
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.665193
ZAR 18.876464
ZMK 10323.885445
ZMW 20.552914
ZWL 369.315822
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

A.Ragab--DT