Dubai Telegraph - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.236804
AFN 75.565453
ALL 93.388548
AMD 421.288328
AOA 1057.902509
ARS 1726.373447
AUD 1.636403
AWG 2.07658
AZN 1.929993
BAM 1.956675
BBD 2.320017
BDT 142.593744
BHD 0.43439
BIF 3442.338825
BMD 1.153656
BND 1.478061
BOB 13.990254
BRL 5.916414
BSD 1.151905
BTN 109.932143
BWP 15.663866
BYN 3.394988
BYR 22611.652061
BZD 2.316716
CAD 1.623626
CDF 2607.261754
CHF 0.932382
CLF 0.02674
CLP 1055.860049
CNY 7.791271
CNH 7.784009
COP 3702.715708
CRC 522.328969
CUC 1.153656
CUP 30.571877
CVE 110.314314
CZK 24.170009
DJF 205.119917
DKK 7.474605
DOP 67.179449
DZD 153.319736
EGP 58.008
ERN 17.304836
ETB 184.729097
FJD 2.552406
FKP 0.857424
GBP 0.857241
GEL 3.011194
GGP 0.857424
GHS 13.495033
GIP 0.857424
GMD 85.370902
GNF 10116.522377
GTQ 8.785928
GYD 241.157804
HKD 9.048485
HNL 30.975855
HRK 7.534758
HTG 150.607326
HUF 360.533526
IDR 20676.971423
ILS 3.459816
IMP 0.857424
INR 109.726384
IQD 1511.865818
IRR 1586420.818241
ISK 141.795588
JEP 0.857424
JMD 182.129839
JOD 0.817945
JPY 181.879019
KES 149.259773
KGS 100.886901
KHR 4663.023877
KMF 493.764206
KRW 1642.817678
KWD 0.356803
KYD 0.959929
KZT 542.652581
LAK 26053.646732
LBP 103152.017797
LKR 386.75289
LRD 207.922948
LSL 18.671935
LTL 3.406445
LVL 0.697835
LYD 7.343
MAD 10.732898
MDL 20.164014
MGA 4972.256159
MKD 61.552516
MMK 2421.872149
MNT 4151.081368
MOP 9.306381
MRU 46.250363
MUR 53.610003
MVR 17.835912
MWK 1997.375571
MXN 19.891736
MYR 4.719588
MZN 73.71562
NAD 18.989689
NGN 1572.386296
NIO 42.388949
NOK 10.997915
NPR 175.890103
NZD 1.964289
OMR 0.443578
PAB 1.151915
PEN 3.904552
PGK 5.102042
PHP 69.977874
PKR 320.543311
PLN 4.295078
PYG 6868.010666
QAR 4.199077
RON 5.251558
RSD 117.361461
RUB 93.01268
RWF 1692.412937
SAR 4.329127
SBD 9.311791
SCR 16.981454
SDG 692.768632
SEK 10.970285
SGD 1.478237
SLE 27.572429
SOS 658.288568
SRD 43.713191
STD 23878.344129
STN 24.510745
SVC 10.079506
SZL 18.971825
THB 38.255804
TJS 10.632053
TMT 4.049332
TND 3.383913
TRY 54.884455
TTD 7.820496
TWD 37.245796
TZS 3054.301208
UAH 51.506879
UGX 4313.928451
USD 1.153656
UYU 46.410948
UZS 13780.417548
VES 870.100121
VND 30303.651557
VUV 137.935702
WST 3.15727
XAF 656.244672
XAG 0.018789
XAU 0.000277
XCD 3.117812
XCG 2.076055
XDR 0.816158
XOF 656.244672
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.973512
ZAR 18.864197
ZMK 10384.289787
ZMW 21.799556
ZWL 371.47667
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    21.79

    +0.14%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.02

    0%

  • NGG

    0.5600

    80.42

    +0.7%

  • RBGPF

    -1.2500

    69.74

    -1.79%

  • GSK

    0.0200

    51.53

    +0.04%

  • RELX

    0.6400

    36.8

    +1.74%

  • RIO

    3.1100

    99.01

    +3.14%

  • BCE

    0.2100

    22

    +0.95%

  • BCC

    3.4600

    86.49

    +4%

  • AZN

    -2.3500

    155.62

    -1.51%

  • RYCEF

    0.2000

    20.4

    +0.98%

  • BTI

    -0.4400

    59.12

    -0.74%

  • JRI

    -0.1000

    12.72

    -0.79%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.69

    +0.51%

  • BP

    -1.8200

    42.44

    -4.29%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

I.Menon--DT