Dubai Telegraph - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.325115
AFN 75.960045
ALL 95.502105
AMD 434.86493
ANG 2.107954
AOA 1081.131951
ARS 1639.146274
AUD 1.625507
AWG 2.119867
AZN 2.005656
BAM 1.957893
BBD 2.371724
BDT 144.491599
BGN 1.964531
BHD 0.444636
BIF 3505.247586
BMD 1.177704
BND 1.493297
BOB 8.1377
BRL 5.789944
BSD 1.177554
BTN 111.199974
BWP 15.810904
BYN 3.328058
BYR 23083.000864
BZD 2.368321
CAD 1.612377
CDF 2727.563092
CHF 0.915417
CLF 0.026664
CLP 1049.393639
CNY 8.014336
CNH 8.004449
COP 4413.940847
CRC 541.330493
CUC 1.177704
CUP 31.209159
CVE 110.373163
CZK 24.292264
DJF 209.714213
DKK 7.473098
DOP 70.034877
DZD 155.763467
EGP 62.090682
ERN 17.665562
ETB 183.883897
FJD 2.572047
FKP 0.865402
GBP 0.864288
GEL 3.155907
GGP 0.865402
GHS 13.266183
GIP 0.865402
GMD 85.972603
GNF 10332.125269
GTQ 8.991613
GYD 246.403439
HKD 9.220214
HNL 31.307472
HRK 7.536367
HTG 154.184845
HUF 354.593164
IDR 20429.633469
ILS 3.416876
IMP 0.865402
INR 111.194996
IQD 1542.749409
IRR 1546207.746698
ISK 143.78596
JEP 0.865402
JMD 185.608441
JOD 0.835018
JPY 184.405653
KES 152.100798
KGS 102.955487
KHR 4725.051722
KMF 493.457997
KPW 1059.875934
KRW 1720.53171
KWD 0.36238
KYD 0.981449
KZT 544.243347
LAK 25826.612157
LBP 105460.451551
LKR 379.121531
LRD 216.101041
LSL 19.320356
LTL 3.477455
LVL 0.712381
LYD 7.446297
MAD 10.769754
MDL 20.138531
MGA 4918.820342
MKD 61.661657
MMK 2472.715575
MNT 4214.888329
MOP 9.495452
MRU 47.071326
MUR 55.139624
MVR 18.201375
MWK 2041.682836
MXN 20.266415
MYR 4.617803
MZN 75.226608
NAD 19.320356
NGN 1601.724866
NIO 43.332465
NOK 10.853009
NPR 177.936238
NZD 1.976529
OMR 0.452833
PAB 1.177659
PEN 4.07139
PGK 5.200096
PHP 71.23949
PKR 328.187817
PLN 4.233434
PYG 7193.049039
QAR 4.304218
RON 5.220994
RSD 117.367624
RUB 87.395277
RWF 1726.445805
SAR 4.452457
SBD 9.459623
SCR 16.870726
SDG 707.204687
SEK 10.853957
SGD 1.492339
SHP 0.879275
SLE 28.968733
SLL 24695.862149
SOS 673.019549
SRD 44.082684
STD 24376.097627
STN 24.524033
SVC 10.304098
SYP 130.18806
SZL 19.307642
THB 37.932704
TJS 10.987647
TMT 4.133741
TND 3.420657
TOP 2.835629
TRY 53.422894
TTD 7.980821
TWD 36.878616
TZS 3060.139342
UAH 51.72599
UGX 4412.323986
USD 1.177704
UYU 46.966026
UZS 14283.998023
VES 584.387458
VND 30983.040139
VUV 138.999877
WST 3.18462
XAF 656.659058
XAG 0.014577
XAU 0.00025
XCD 3.182804
XCG 2.12228
XDR 0.819107
XOF 656.600455
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.004388
ZAR 19.315467
ZMK 10600.751704
ZMW 22.420971
ZWL 379.220248
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    63.18

    0%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.995

    +0.22%

  • NGG

    1.1500

    87.06

    +1.32%

  • RYCEF

    -0.8500

    16.6

    -5.12%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    23.435

    +0.06%

  • GSK

    -0.2500

    50.25

    -0.5%

  • RELX

    0.0409

    33.545

    +0.12%

  • RIO

    1.7750

    104.885

    +1.69%

  • BCE

    -0.1270

    24.443

    -0.52%

  • BCC

    -0.3700

    72.39

    -0.51%

  • AZN

    0.0400

    182.56

    +0.02%

  • JRI

    0.0050

    13.155

    +0.04%

  • BTI

    0.2200

    58.3

    +0.38%

  • BP

    -0.3150

    43.495

    -0.72%

  • VOD

    0.4250

    16.115

    +2.64%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

I.Menon--DT