Dubai Telegraph - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.194308
AFN 72.52041
ALL 93.251191
AMD 420.526993
ANG 2.044792
AOA 1047.866508
ARS 1640.876124
AUD 1.632903
AWG 2.055753
AZN 1.940568
BAM 1.924616
BBD 2.301411
BDT 140.268483
BGN 1.931129
BHD 0.430685
BIF 3415.976235
BMD 1.142085
BND 1.463881
BOB 7.924599
BRL 5.814127
BSD 1.142685
BTN 107.996157
BWP 15.31092
BYN 3.163542
BYR 22384.866
BZD 2.298163
CAD 1.616804
CDF 2649.637338
CHF 0.923553
CLF 0.025703
CLP 1011.613063
CNY 7.717583
CNH 7.762335
COP 3923.061975
CRC 520.466966
CUC 1.142085
CUP 30.265253
CVE 108.897894
CZK 23.757709
DJF 202.971194
DKK 7.350619
DOP 66.926117
DZD 151.759082
EGP 56.999403
ERN 17.131275
ETB 180.877736
FJD 2.551076
FKP 0.852527
GBP 0.866828
GEL 3.020814
GGP 0.852527
GHS 12.902933
GIP 0.852527
GMD 83.371845
GNF 10024.649964
GTQ 8.70995
GYD 239.027087
HKD 8.951674
HNL 30.490468
HRK 7.533873
HTG 149.23202
HUF 343.367446
IDR 20270.409831
ILS 3.373828
IMP 0.852527
INR 107.709463
IQD 1496.13135
IRR 1570366.874934
ISK 141.995464
JEP 0.852527
JMD 180.721797
JOD 0.80976
JPY 183.033967
KES 147.923053
KGS 99.875061
KHR 4582.608142
KMF 485.38591
KPW 1027.8769
KRW 1726.678335
KWD 0.351874
KYD 0.952271
KZT 557.24616
LAK 25160.132326
LBP 102273.711812
LKR 382.810738
LRD 208.030589
LSL 18.495904
LTL 3.37228
LVL 0.690836
LYD 7.280814
MAD 10.558596
MDL 19.939917
MGA 4796.756942
MKD 60.629453
MMK 2398.316589
MNT 4087.958667
MOP 9.219419
MRU 45.774818
MUR 53.826741
MVR 17.656913
MWK 1982.659854
MXN 19.87116
MYR 4.642352
MZN 72.981636
NAD 18.503966
NGN 1552.230167
NIO 41.811846
NOK 11.158684
NPR 172.792757
NZD 1.994455
OMR 0.43913
PAB 1.142685
PEN 3.897377
PGK 5.011184
PHP 68.951108
PKR 317.840185
PLN 4.165949
PYG 6973.017439
QAR 4.157763
RON 5.147419
RSD 115.431735
RUB 83.339709
RWF 1699.42248
SAR 4.284982
SBD 9.206832
SCR 16.12067
SDG 685.82127
SEK 10.995541
SGD 1.464187
SHP 0.852682
SLE 28.266937
SLL 23948.955593
SOS 652.710174
SRD 42.636347
STD 23638.85364
STN 24.440619
SVC 9.99809
SYP 126.237051
SZL 18.498214
THB 37.157165
TJS 10.59257
TMT 4.008718
TND 3.325466
TOP 2.749867
TRY 53.042608
TTD 7.76223
TWD 36.042492
TZS 2997.976517
UAH 51.17556
UGX 4227.502529
USD 1.142085
UYU 46.13292
UZS 13710.730262
VES 680.724228
VND 30066.52971
VUV 135.895439
WST 3.129029
XAF 645.498109
XAG 0.017975
XAU 0.000276
XCD 3.086542
XCG 2.059414
XDR 0.803682
XOF 645.27823
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.530062
ZAR 18.866359
ZMK 10280.138245
ZMW 20.196756
ZWL 367.750904
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

Y.Al-Shehhi--DT