Dubai Telegraph - AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes

EUR -
AED 4.193409
AFN 71.936261
ALL 94.313517
AMD 420.265722
ANG 2.044352
AOA 1047.066868
ARS 1689.072446
AUD 1.659662
AWG 2.056738
AZN 1.945481
BAM 1.958174
BBD 2.299788
BDT 140.730617
BGN 1.930714
BHD 0.430513
BIF 3396.988644
BMD 1.141839
BND 1.476978
BOB 7.907414
BRL 5.927742
BSD 1.141884
BTN 107.892443
BWP 15.517473
BYN 3.311486
BYR 22380.050817
BZD 2.296464
CAD 1.622442
CDF 2589.120289
CHF 0.923411
CLF 0.026737
CLP 1052.308099
CNY 7.762395
CNH 7.765695
COP 3935.109456
CRC 517.923377
CUC 1.141839
CUP 30.258742
CVE 110.39836
CZK 24.263572
DJF 203.332061
DKK 7.474417
DOP 67.901727
DZD 152.241244
EGP 56.290733
ERN 17.12759
ETB 184.085649
FJD 2.567711
FKP 0.865351
GBP 0.862115
GEL 3.020169
GGP 0.865351
GHS 12.914374
GIP 0.865351
GMD 83.354533
GNF 10010.092064
GTQ 8.711485
GYD 238.844337
HKD 8.955212
HNL 30.55778
HRK 7.534429
HTG 149.239626
HUF 354.896792
IDR 20413.803496
ILS 3.411302
IMP 0.865351
INR 107.964733
IQD 1495.800358
IRR 1570314.535312
ISK 143.803363
JEP 0.865351
JMD 179.797981
JOD 0.809586
JPY 184.907748
KES 147.869387
KGS 99.854174
KHR 4591.5264
KMF 495.557874
KPW 1027.655794
KRW 1762.782919
KWD 0.353502
KYD 0.951533
KZT 554.399998
LAK 25609.8242
LBP 102250.125882
LKR 383.942116
LRD 207.807389
LSL 18.760981
LTL 3.371555
LVL 0.690687
LYD 7.335862
MAD 10.700273
MDL 20.182026
MGA 4858.84815
MKD 61.634438
MMK 2397.462543
MNT 4087.701951
MOP 9.223981
MRU 45.571249
MUR 53.940134
MVR 17.641444
MWK 1979.957083
MXN 20.014748
MYR 4.648392
MZN 72.96563
NAD 18.761145
NGN 1577.838644
NIO 42.020576
NOK 11.338818
NPR 172.629779
NZD 2.023231
OMR 0.439035
PAB 1.141859
PEN 3.899293
PGK 5.013078
PHP 69.912559
PKR 317.516265
PLN 4.289605
PYG 6953.430104
QAR 4.162246
RON 5.242754
RSD 117.385642
RUB 88.243753
RWF 1676.195463
SAR 4.289363
SBD 9.194036
SCR 15.889801
SDG 685.104142
SEK 11.113739
SGD 1.477066
SHP 0.852498
SLE 28.318388
SLL 23943.80396
SOS 652.585457
SRD 42.812695
STD 23633.768713
STN 24.529739
SVC 9.991069
SYP 126.209896
SZL 18.756576
THB 38.008402
TJS 10.584701
TMT 3.996438
TND 3.3822
TOP 2.749276
TRY 53.256638
TTD 7.762343
TWD 36.406978
TZS 2997.331628
UAH 51.246329
UGX 4185.073842
USD 1.141839
UYU 45.945703
UZS 13761.684201
VES 708.800171
VND 30018.955918
VUV 136.083591
WST 3.175321
XAF 656.747467
XAG 0.019725
XAU 0.000284
XCD 3.085878
XCG 2.057877
XDR 0.817981
XOF 656.750346
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.471391
ZAR 18.766358
ZMK 10277.916815
ZMW 20.67261
ZWL 367.671798
  • RBGPF

    0.2000

    61.5

    +0.33%

  • CMSC

    0.0700

    22

    +0.32%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    18.8

    +0.27%

  • VOD

    -0.1950

    13.695

    -1.42%

  • AZN

    1.0500

    189.46

    +0.55%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    31.28

    -0.19%

  • GSK

    -0.1050

    52.395

    -0.2%

  • NGG

    0.3900

    83.4

    +0.47%

  • RIO

    0.2090

    93.949

    +0.22%

  • BCC

    -2.0620

    78.958

    -2.61%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    21.795

    +0.11%

  • JRI

    0.1000

    12.89

    +0.78%

  • BP

    0.4100

    37.54

    +1.09%

  • BCE

    -0.5330

    22.387

    -2.38%

  • BTI

    -0.3100

    62.45

    -0.5%

AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes
AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes / Photo: Chris Delmas - AFP

AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes

When outraged Filipinos turned to an AI-powered chatbot to verify a viral photograph of a lawmaker embroiled in a corruption scandal, the tool failed to detect it was fabricated -- even though it had generated the image itself.

Text size:

Internet users are increasingly turning to chatbots to verify images in real time, but the tools often fail, raising questions about their visual debunking capabilities at a time when major tech platforms are scaling back human fact-checking.

In many cases, the tools wrongly identify images as real even when they are generated using the same generative models, further muddying an online information landscape awash with AI-generated fakes.

Among them is a fabricated image circulating on social media of Elizaldy Co, a former Philippine lawmaker charged by prosecutors in a multibillion-dollar flood-control corruption scam that sparked massive protests in the disaster-prone country.

The image of Co, whose whereabouts has been unknown since the official probe began, appeared to show him in Portugal.

When online sleuths tracking him asked Google's new AI mode whether the image was real, it incorrectly said it was authentic.

AFP's fact-checkers tracked down its creator and determined that the image was generated using Google AI.

"These models are trained primarily on language patterns and lack the specialized visual understanding needed to accurately identify AI-generated or manipulated imagery," Alon Yamin, chief executive of AI content detection platform Copyleaks, told AFP.

"With AI chatbots, even when an image originates from a similar generative model, the chatbot often provides inconsistent or overly generalized assessments, making them unreliable for tasks like fact-checking or verifying authenticity."

Google did not respond to AFP’s request for comment.

- 'Distinguishable from reality' -

AFP found similar examples of AI tools failing to verify their own creations.

During last month's deadly protests over lucrative benefits for senior officials in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, social media users shared a fabricated image purportedly showing men marching with flags and torches.

An AFP analysis found it was created using Google's Gemini AI model.

But Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot falsely identified it as a genuine image of the protest.

"This inability to correctly identify AI images stems from the fact that they (AI models) are programmed only to mimic well," Rossine Fallorina, from the nonprofit Sigla Research Center, told AFP.

"In a sense, they can only generate things to resemble. They cannot ascertain whether the resemblance is actually distinguishable from reality."

Earlier this year, Columbia University's Tow Center for Digital Journalism tested the ability of seven AI chatbots -- including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, and Gemini -- to verify 10 images from photojournalists of news events.

All seven models failed to correctly identify the provenance of the photos, the study said.

- 'Shocked' -

AFP tracked down the source of Co's photo that garnered over a million views across social media -- a middle-aged web developer in the Philippines, who said he created it "for fun" using Nano Banana, Gemini's AI image generator.

"Sadly, a lot of people believed it," he told AFP, requesting anonymity to avoid a backlash.

"I edited my post -- and added 'AI generated' to stop the spread -- because I was shocked at how many shares it got."

Such cases show how AI-generated photos flooding social platforms can look virtually identical to real imagery.

The trend has fueled concerns as surveys show online users are increasingly shifting from traditional search engines to AI tools for information gathering and verifying information.

The shift comes as Meta announced earlier this year it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, turning over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as "Community Notes."

Human fact-checking has long been a flashpoint in hyperpolarized societies, where conservative advocates accuse professional fact-checkers of liberal bias, a charge they reject.

AFP currently works in 26 languages with Meta's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union.

Researchers say AI models can be useful to professional fact-checkers, helping to quickly geolocate images and spot visual clues to establish authenticity. But they caution that they cannot replace the work of trained human fact-checkers.

"We can't rely on AI tools to combat AI in the long run," Fallorina said.

burs-ac/sla/sms

G.Koya--DT