Dubai Telegraph - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.256969
AFN 73.026624
ALL 95.949668
AMD 436.29849
ANG 2.074968
AOA 1062.937298
ARS 1612.956254
AUD 1.648622
AWG 2.089361
AZN 1.97515
BAM 1.955793
BBD 2.330592
BDT 141.989509
BGN 1.981339
BHD 0.437098
BIF 3425.188147
BMD 1.159146
BND 1.479895
BOB 7.995972
BRL 6.159011
BSD 1.157196
BTN 108.180626
BWP 15.778945
BYN 3.510788
BYR 22719.261378
BZD 2.327292
CAD 1.591102
CDF 2637.057544
CHF 0.913917
CLF 0.027244
CLP 1075.745893
CNY 7.982348
CNH 8.005172
COP 4253.385281
CRC 540.49813
CUC 1.159146
CUP 30.717369
CVE 110.264618
CZK 24.515015
DJF 206.059287
DKK 7.48519
DOP 68.689762
DZD 153.294785
EGP 59.995792
ERN 17.38719
ETB 182.369469
FJD 2.566871
FKP 0.868888
GBP 0.86899
GEL 3.147128
GGP 0.868888
GHS 12.613956
GIP 0.868888
GMD 85.201694
GNF 10142.964899
GTQ 8.863969
GYD 242.099162
HKD 9.082199
HNL 30.628894
HRK 7.547552
HTG 151.809475
HUF 393.739159
IDR 19654.711213
ILS 3.60393
IMP 0.868888
INR 108.971952
IQD 1515.894754
IRR 1525001.44174
ISK 144.047519
JEP 0.868888
JMD 181.799371
JOD 0.82188
JPY 184.582853
KES 149.909481
KGS 101.364887
KHR 4623.983998
KMF 494.955743
KPW 1043.265709
KRW 1744.874492
KWD 0.35536
KYD 0.964297
KZT 556.328075
LAK 24848.914008
LBP 103633.441366
LKR 360.978751
LRD 211.759267
LSL 19.520632
LTL 3.422657
LVL 0.701156
LYD 7.407974
MAD 10.813063
MDL 20.15193
MGA 4824.983303
MKD 61.639787
MMK 2432.834089
MNT 4136.040892
MOP 9.340468
MRU 46.32084
MUR 53.912319
MVR 17.920835
MWK 2006.593056
MXN 20.746631
MYR 4.565921
MZN 74.073751
NAD 19.520632
NGN 1572.092184
NIO 42.579853
NOK 11.093021
NPR 173.089401
NZD 1.985179
OMR 0.445696
PAB 1.157196
PEN 4.000686
PGK 4.994983
PHP 69.723065
PKR 323.078682
PLN 4.282755
PYG 7557.973845
QAR 4.231485
RON 5.101986
RSD 117.449594
RUB 96.003268
RWF 1683.694173
SAR 4.352195
SBD 9.33305
SCR 15.877645
SDG 696.647132
SEK 10.831104
SGD 1.486609
SHP 0.86966
SLE 28.486057
SLL 24306.724357
SOS 661.297712
SRD 43.45349
STD 23991.981659
STN 24.499915
SVC 10.124965
SYP 128.330532
SZL 19.526932
THB 38.14522
TJS 11.114462
TMT 4.068602
TND 3.417588
TOP 2.790945
TRY 51.295112
TTD 7.850973
TWD 37.135217
TZS 3008.589588
UAH 50.693025
UGX 4373.984863
USD 1.159146
UYU 46.629839
UZS 14107.951178
VES 527.05282
VND 30499.449254
VUV 137.764445
WST 3.161931
XAF 655.95473
XAG 0.017051
XAU 0.000257
XCD 3.13265
XCG 2.085493
XDR 0.815797
XOF 655.95473
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.576393
ZAR 19.85325
ZMK 10433.709028
ZMW 22.593922
ZWL 373.244535
  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • RYCEF

    -1.2600

    15.34

    -8.21%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

B.Krishnan--DT