Dubai Telegraph - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.35335
AFN 77.050797
ALL 96.614026
AMD 452.873985
ANG 2.121943
AOA 1087.00321
ARS 1723.800654
AUD 1.702936
AWG 2.136666
AZN 2.019869
BAM 1.955248
BBD 2.406031
BDT 145.978765
BGN 1.990709
BHD 0.449191
BIF 3539.115218
BMD 1.18539
BND 1.512879
BOB 8.254703
BRL 6.231008
BSD 1.194568
BTN 109.699013
BWP 15.630651
BYN 3.402439
BYR 23233.647084
BZD 2.402531
CAD 1.615035
CDF 2684.909135
CHF 0.915881
CLF 0.026011
CLP 1027.058063
CNY 8.240537
CNH 8.248946
COP 4354.94563
CRC 591.535401
CUC 1.18539
CUP 31.412839
CVE 110.234327
CZK 24.334287
DJF 212.720809
DKK 7.470097
DOP 74.383698
DZD 153.702477
EGP 55.903178
ERN 17.780852
ETB 185.572763
FJD 2.613371
FKP 0.865849
GBP 0.865754
GEL 3.194674
GGP 0.865849
GHS 12.974143
GIP 0.865849
GMD 86.533903
GNF 10372.164298
GTQ 9.16245
GYD 249.920458
HKD 9.257838
HNL 31.365884
HRK 7.536597
HTG 156.336498
HUF 381.328619
IDR 19883.141804
ILS 3.663335
IMP 0.865849
INR 108.679593
IQD 1553.453801
IRR 49934.560565
ISK 144.985527
JEP 0.865849
JMD 187.197911
JOD 0.840489
JPY 183.433247
KES 152.915746
KGS 103.662825
KHR 4768.236408
KMF 491.93733
KPW 1066.851144
KRW 1719.752641
KWD 0.36382
KYD 0.995519
KZT 600.800289
LAK 25485.888797
LBP 101410.128375
LKR 369.427204
LRD 219.593979
LSL 19.132649
LTL 3.500149
LVL 0.717031
LYD 7.495914
MAD 10.835985
MDL 20.092409
MGA 5260.173275
MKD 61.631889
MMK 2489.708718
MNT 4227.553379
MOP 9.606327
MRU 47.30937
MUR 53.852723
MVR 18.32658
MWK 2059.023112
MXN 20.70407
MYR 4.672854
MZN 75.580924
NAD 18.967522
NGN 1643.520192
NIO 43.508231
NOK 11.437875
NPR 175.519161
NZD 1.96876
OMR 0.458133
PAB 1.194573
PEN 3.994177
PGK 5.066955
PHP 69.837307
PKR 331.998194
PLN 4.215189
PYG 8001.773454
QAR 4.316051
RON 5.097064
RSD 117.111851
RUB 90.544129
RWF 1742.915022
SAR 4.446506
SBD 9.544303
SCR 17.200951
SDG 713.016537
SEK 10.580086
SGD 1.505332
SHP 0.88935
SLE 28.834661
SLL 24857.038036
SOS 677.454816
SRD 45.104693
STD 24535.182964
STN 24.493185
SVC 10.452048
SYP 13109.911225
SZL 19.132635
THB 37.411351
TJS 11.151397
TMT 4.148866
TND 3.37248
TOP 2.854135
TRY 51.47818
TTD 8.110743
TWD 37.456003
TZS 3052.380052
UAH 51.199753
UGX 4270.811618
USD 1.18539
UYU 46.357101
UZS 14603.874776
VES 410.075543
VND 30749.020682
VUV 140.814221
WST 3.213333
XAF 655.774526
XAG 0.014004
XAU 0.000244
XCD 3.203577
XCG 2.153028
XDR 0.815573
XOF 655.774526
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.508153
ZAR 19.136335
ZMK 10669.938133
ZMW 23.443477
ZWL 381.695147
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4300

    16

    -2.69%

  • AZN

    0.1800

    92.77

    +0.19%

  • BCE

    0.3700

    25.86

    +1.43%

  • GSK

    0.9400

    51.6

    +1.82%

  • NGG

    0.2000

    85.27

    +0.23%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.76

    +0.21%

  • RELX

    -0.3700

    35.8

    -1.03%

  • RBGPF

    1.3800

    83.78

    +1.65%

  • RIO

    -4.1000

    91.03

    -4.5%

  • VOD

    -0.0600

    14.65

    -0.41%

  • BCC

    0.5100

    80.81

    +0.63%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.05

    -0.17%

  • JRI

    0.1400

    13.08

    +1.07%

  • BP

    -0.1600

    37.88

    -0.42%

  • BTI

    0.4600

    60.68

    +0.76%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

B.Krishnan--DT