Dubai Telegraph - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.196425
AFN 73.130115
ALL 94.208885
AMD 420.373504
ANG 2.045824
AOA 1048.393538
ARS 1695.416971
AUD 1.651077
AWG 2.05679
AZN 1.948554
BAM 1.960486
BBD 2.302073
BDT 140.818428
BGN 1.932103
BHD 0.430936
BIF 3401.299907
BMD 1.142661
BND 1.479556
BOB 7.91523
BRL 5.924129
BSD 1.142932
BTN 108.157177
BWP 15.490635
BYN 3.350653
BYR 22396.15855
BZD 2.298624
CAD 1.622642
CDF 2599.553764
CHF 0.922945
CLF 0.026753
CLP 1052.916354
CNY 7.763183
CNH 7.763257
COP 3929.554564
CRC 521.138767
CUC 1.142661
CUP 30.28052
CVE 110.534516
CZK 24.278004
DJF 203.074318
DKK 7.474421
DOP 68.133745
DZD 152.176492
EGP 56.140657
ERN 17.139917
ETB 182.948582
FJD 2.562132
FKP 0.862298
GBP 0.861625
GEL 3.016598
GGP 0.862298
GHS 12.940762
GIP 0.862298
GMD 83.986497
GNF 10019.210632
GTQ 8.719804
GYD 239.080859
HKD 8.961771
HNL 30.583501
HRK 7.535395
HTG 149.439146
HUF 355.90011
IDR 20482.315389
ILS 3.405187
IMP 0.862298
INR 108.017247
IQD 1497.298448
IRR 1572301.743136
ISK 143.804042
JEP 0.862298
JMD 180.080422
JOD 0.810141
JPY 185.768108
KES 147.951739
KGS 99.92586
KHR 4600.176351
KMF 493.630069
KPW 1028.395435
KRW 1768.381148
KWD 0.35394
KYD 0.952514
KZT 547.696275
LAK 25634.607494
LBP 102352.470275
LKR 384.042968
LRD 207.487681
LSL 18.704015
LTL 3.373981
LVL 0.691184
LYD 7.342775
MAD 10.742793
MDL 20.196067
MGA 4848.652737
MKD 61.644253
MMK 2399.002754
MNT 4093.079871
MOP 9.232793
MRU 45.66996
MUR 53.921744
MVR 17.664881
MWK 1981.915159
MXN 19.974299
MYR 4.666511
MZN 72.959186
NAD 18.704753
NGN 1577.420835
NIO 42.061085
NOK 11.312305
NPR 173.018843
NZD 2.012028
OMR 0.439355
PAB 1.142967
PEN 3.906288
PGK 5.020153
PHP 70.294803
PKR 317.821418
PLN 4.298573
PYG 6950.826539
QAR 4.177914
RON 5.239557
RSD 117.359254
RUB 89.930165
RWF 1675.370393
SAR 4.294421
SBD 9.215609
SCR 15.493371
SDG 686.171693
SEK 11.075803
SGD 1.47841
SHP 0.853112
SLE 28.341524
SLL 23961.037183
SOS 653.181219
SRD 42.854937
STD 23650.778792
STN 24.558699
SVC 10.001167
SYP 126.300734
SZL 18.701536
THB 37.971788
TJS 10.561051
TMT 4.010741
TND 3.387296
TOP 2.751254
TRY 53.30434
TTD 7.757644
TWD 36.343441
TZS 2999.483208
UAH 51.221998
UGX 4189.141059
USD 1.142661
UYU 45.881874
UZS 13720.4339
VES 711.013496
VND 30069.128176
VUV 137.06569
WST 3.177672
XAF 657.554561
XAG 0.019913
XAU 0.000287
XCD 3.0881
XCG 2.059805
XDR 0.818415
XOF 657.548792
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.632766
ZAR 18.717972
ZMK 10285.326573
ZMW 20.602054
ZWL 367.936424
  • RBGPF

    0.6100

    65.61

    +0.93%

  • RYCEF

    0.7600

    19.15

    +3.97%

  • VOD

    -0.4900

    13.2

    -3.71%

  • GSK

    -0.2450

    52.565

    -0.47%

  • CMSC

    0.0172

    21.71

    +0.08%

  • BTI

    -0.8550

    61.885

    -1.38%

  • BCE

    -0.5800

    21.68

    -2.68%

  • NGG

    -0.6000

    83.16

    -0.72%

  • RIO

    0.5100

    94.8

    +0.54%

  • CMSD

    0.0300

    21.93

    +0.14%

  • RELX

    0.2850

    31.575

    +0.9%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.95

    +0.69%

  • BP

    -0.3250

    37.025

    -0.88%

  • BCC

    -1.2000

    78.06

    -1.54%

  • AZN

    -2.1500

    188.8

    -1.14%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

B.Krishnan--DT