Dubai Telegraph - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.208691
AFN 74.49053
ALL 91.373465
AMD 416.155059
ANG 2.051759
AOA 1052.027942
ARS 1730.468757
AUD 1.609539
AWG 2.065665
AZN 1.961226
BAM 1.954104
BBD 2.308896
BDT 140.777785
BGN 1.929224
BHD 0.432125
BIF 3446.667946
BMD 1.146
BND 1.464915
BOB 11.263516
BRL 5.879673
BSD 1.146425
BTN 109.846679
BWP 15.546978
BYN 3.467789
BYR 22461.602088
BZD 2.305659
CAD 1.606176
CDF 2648.405741
CHF 0.946178
CLF 0.027899
CLP 1101.604309
CNY 7.686853
CNH 7.676705
COP 3635.593658
CRC 512.863711
CUC 1.146
CUP 30.369003
CVE 110.172719
CZK 24.338693
DJF 204.149004
DKK 7.475536
DOP 67.66244
DZD 153.420998
EGP 59.744083
ERN 17.190002
ETB 187.257535
FJD 2.541713
FKP 0.858702
GBP 0.85881
GEL 2.967453
GGP 0.858702
GHS 13.20688
GIP 0.858702
GMD 84.229457
GNF 10078.558166
GTQ 8.748558
GYD 239.849102
HKD 8.990314
HNL 30.775088
HRK 7.532671
HTG 149.832539
HUF 364.287648
IDR 20419.429898
ILS 3.481153
IMP 0.858702
INR 109.939744
IQD 1501.822411
IRR 1575291.746358
ISK 139.399218
JEP 0.858702
JMD 181.022846
JOD 0.812527
JPY 180.872625
KES 148.418158
KGS 100.217734
KHR 4646.108404
KMF 490.488325
KPW 1031.40046
KRW 1590.556037
KWD 0.353427
KYD 0.9554
KZT 512.535046
LAK 25689.370415
LBP 102660.962927
LKR 379.460507
LRD 198.333875
LSL 18.638045
LTL 3.38384
LVL 0.693204
LYD 7.281901
MAD 10.862002
MDL 20.148124
MGA 4969.815583
MKD 61.478237
MMK 2406.248034
MNT 4124.868785
MOP 9.26336
MRU 46.119766
MUR 54.515126
MVR 17.705329
MWK 1987.934899
MXN 19.686666
MYR 4.679004
MZN 73.241042
NAD 18.638207
NGN 1526.895582
NIO 42.183379
NOK 10.80928
NPR 175.759483
NZD 2.006993
OMR 0.440634
PAB 1.146435
PEN 3.868542
PGK 5.102726
PHP 71.989464
PKR 317.75616
PLN 4.363539
PYG 6796.277763
QAR 4.190372
RON 5.265186
RSD 117.403102
RUB 96.436364
RWF 1684.089401
SAR 4.2707
SBD 9.168588
SCR 15.800933
SDG 689.314835
SEK 11.289585
SGD 1.46528
SHP 0.856662
SLE 28.249158
SLL 24031.039929
SOS 655.142675
SRD 43.257492
STD 23719.88844
STN 24.479176
SVC 10.031598
SYP 14900.293676
SZL 18.63215
THB 38.226557
TJS 10.575642
TMT 4.02246
TND 3.372272
TOP 2.759293
TRY 55.907733
TTD 7.78238
TWD 36.492315
TZS 3038.743037
UAH 51.220198
UGX 4522.074187
USD 1.146
UYU 46.101385
UZS 13573.453168
VES 971.218013
VND 29821.214771
VUV 135.56206
WST 3.157026
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.017187
XAU 0.000262
XCD 3.097123
XCG 2.066106
XDR 0.810282
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.085969
ZAR 18.645227
ZMK 10315.379406
ZMW 22.533028
ZWL 369.011567
SSP 6490.970489
MXV 2.231917
  • GSK

    -1.4250

    49.635

    -2.87%

  • BTI

    -0.1100

    55.91

    -0.2%

  • BP

    -0.4100

    45.01

    -0.91%

  • AZN

    -0.0500

    166.09

    -0.03%

  • RIO

    -1.3500

    96.69

    -1.4%

  • NGG

    -1.1050

    76.495

    -1.44%

  • CMSC

    0.0690

    20.739

    +0.33%

  • BCC

    -0.1700

    75.36

    -0.23%

  • RBGPF

    -1.6900

    68.3

    -2.47%

  • BCE

    -0.3100

    21.97

    -1.41%

  • RYCEF

    0.7100

    20

    +3.55%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.42

    -0.15%

  • VOD

    -0.7950

    16.725

    -4.75%

  • JRI

    -0.0900

    11.52

    -0.78%

  • RELX

    -0.8150

    33.565

    -2.43%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

B.Krishnan--DT