Dubai Telegraph - UK mulls impact of landmark gender ruling

EUR -
AED 4.317798
AFN 77.77342
ALL 96.491874
AMD 448.694716
ANG 2.104995
AOA 1078.126398
ARS 1690.956864
AUD 1.772517
AWG 2.119218
AZN 2.002685
BAM 1.956649
BBD 2.367327
BDT 143.642335
BGN 1.957187
BHD 0.443232
BIF 3472.091988
BMD 1.17571
BND 1.515351
BOB 8.151537
BRL 6.366
BSD 1.17541
BTN 106.61687
BWP 15.523737
BYN 3.437392
BYR 23043.92017
BZD 2.363926
CAD 1.619006
CDF 2645.348639
CHF 0.935207
CLF 0.027402
CLP 1074.986795
CNY 8.285524
CNH 8.275336
COP 4488.861592
CRC 587.95515
CUC 1.17571
CUP 31.156321
CVE 110.312872
CZK 24.333667
DJF 209.310833
DKK 7.469622
DOP 74.662401
DZD 152.428443
EGP 55.767585
ERN 17.635653
ETB 182.940289
FJD 2.709131
FKP 0.87872
GBP 0.879237
GEL 3.168582
GGP 0.87872
GHS 13.516866
GIP 0.87872
GMD 86.422158
GNF 10221.39222
GTQ 9.003907
GYD 245.906714
HKD 9.147331
HNL 30.960436
HRK 7.534657
HTG 154.006178
HUF 384.569525
IDR 19621.780454
ILS 3.77738
IMP 0.87872
INR 106.852365
IQD 1539.774751
IRR 49509.157386
ISK 148.198279
JEP 0.87872
JMD 187.841516
JOD 0.833609
JPY 181.897073
KES 151.565774
KGS 102.815855
KHR 4703.020928
KMF 493.798919
KPW 1058.139486
KRW 1730.140146
KWD 0.360638
KYD 0.979529
KZT 606.245665
LAK 25470.053018
LBP 105275.541947
LKR 363.437718
LRD 207.486513
LSL 19.720958
LTL 3.471567
LVL 0.711175
LYD 6.371765
MAD 10.788882
MDL 19.84061
MGA 5239.273642
MKD 61.559672
MMK 2468.716375
MNT 4170.058344
MOP 9.422329
MRU 46.75629
MUR 54.024021
MVR 18.104636
MWK 2038.184493
MXN 21.146618
MYR 4.805173
MZN 75.130468
NAD 19.721042
NGN 1706.17897
NIO 43.258589
NOK 11.944434
NPR 170.565019
NZD 2.037112
OMR 0.452051
PAB 1.17541
PEN 3.958135
PGK 4.995146
PHP 69.204069
PKR 329.405149
PLN 4.218742
PYG 7894.425876
QAR 4.283859
RON 5.091762
RSD 117.392282
RUB 93.468622
RWF 1711.342657
SAR 4.411408
SBD 9.593848
SCR 17.757232
SDG 707.190966
SEK 10.920818
SGD 1.516214
SHP 0.882087
SLE 28.275908
SLL 24654.059615
SOS 670.591011
SRD 45.39442
STD 24334.827655
STN 24.510532
SVC 10.284507
SYP 13001.557283
SZL 19.72456
THB 37.03854
TJS 10.80917
TMT 4.114986
TND 3.437492
TOP 2.830828
TRY 50.202359
TTD 7.977462
TWD 36.978431
TZS 2918.699935
UAH 49.68226
UGX 4186.816917
USD 1.17571
UYU 46.065868
UZS 14220.231506
VES 314.431645
VND 30956.449902
VUV 142.8039
WST 3.267666
XAF 656.241784
XAG 0.018679
XAU 0.000274
XCD 3.177416
XCG 2.118328
XDR 0.816154
XOF 656.241784
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.347694
ZAR 19.755935
ZMK 10582.803308
ZMW 27.239821
ZWL 378.578209
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    23.3

    0%

  • NGG

    1.1000

    76.03

    +1.45%

  • RYCEF

    0.3100

    14.95

    +2.07%

  • BCC

    -1.1800

    75.33

    -1.57%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    57.74

    +1.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.4300

    81.6

    +0.53%

  • BCE

    0.2161

    23.61

    +0.92%

  • RIO

    0.1600

    75.82

    +0.21%

  • GSK

    0.4300

    49.24

    +0.87%

  • BP

    -0.0100

    35.25

    -0.03%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    12.7

    +0.87%

  • CMSD

    0.1150

    23.365

    +0.49%

  • RELX

    0.7000

    41.08

    +1.7%

  • JRI

    -0.0065

    13.56

    -0.05%

  • AZN

    1.7300

    91.56

    +1.89%

UK mulls impact of landmark gender ruling
UK mulls impact of landmark gender ruling / Photo: HENRY NICHOLLS - AFP

UK mulls impact of landmark gender ruling

From toilets and changing rooms to sports pitches and hospital wards, a ruling by Britain's Supreme Court on the legal definition of a "woman" is expected to have far-reaching consequences.

Text size:

- What did the Supreme Court say? -

The court ruled on Wednesday that the legal definition of a "woman" is based on a person's sex at birth.

Five judges unanimously ruled that "the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman, and biological sex".

The court's pronouncement follows a legal battle between the Scottish government and campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) involving clashing interpretations of the Equality Act.

While the Scottish government argued that the law gave trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) the same protections as a biological female, the campaign group disagreed.

- What impact on women-only spaces? -

Single-sex spaces and services including changing rooms "will function properly only if sex is interpreted as biological sex", the judgement said.

Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is responsible for enforcing the Equality Act, told BBC radio the law was now clear.

"If a service provider says 'we're offering a women's toilet', then trans people should not be using that single-sex facility," she said.

But she highlighted that there was no law forcing organisations to provide single-sex spaces and no law preventing them providing unisex toilets or changing rooms.

She said trans rights organisations should push for more neutral third spaces to accommodate trans people.

- Will trans women still have access to female-only hospital wards? -

Current guidance from the body that runs the state-funded National Health Service in England states that trans people should be "accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress, and the name and pronouns they currently use".

The advice has meant that trans women have been allowed to opt for treatment in women-only hospital wards even if they do not have a gender recognition certificate or have not legally changed their name.

The certificate is a UK legal document that recognises an individual's gender identity, allowing them to legally change their sex.

"The NHS is currently reviewing guidance on same sex accommodation," an NHS England spokesperson told AFP.

Falkner said the watchdog would pursue the NHS if it did not change the existing guidance on the treatment of trans women patients.

- What future for trans women in sport? -

The court decision is a victory for prominent voices in the debate such as swimmer Sharron Davies, who won an Olympic silver medal at the Moscow Games in 1980.

It was time for sports bodies to "protect every female athlete", she said after the ruling.

Campaigners said there were now "no excuses" for allowing transgender women to compete in women's sporting events.

Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the charity Sex Matters, said the law had in fact always been "clear that everyone male can be excluded to provide fair, safe sport for women and girls, but some people claimed it was unkind or complicated to do so".

Falkner said the ruling made it "simple" that people assigned male at birth cannot take part in women's sport.

Sebastian Coe, the president of World Athletics, told Sky News he welcomed the ruling "because it has produced clarity".

"It is really important that we continue to protect the integrity of women's competition," he added.

Former Football Association (FA) chairman David Triesman told the Daily Telegraph that rulemakers who allowed trans women to compete alongside biological women should "stand down immediately".

- Will gender recognition certificates be abolished? -

The usefulness of the gender recognition certificate would be re-assessed in the light of the ruling, Falkner said.

Asked if she thought the documents were now "worthless", she said she believed they were "quite important" but that future litigation was likely to provide clarity on their "efficacy".

"It's going to be a space that we'll have to watch very carefully as we go on," she said.

"There will be other areas... the government is thinking of digital IDs, and if digital IDs come in, then what documentation will provide the identity of that person?"

A.Padmanabhan--DT