Dubai Telegraph - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

EUR -
AED 3.85579
AFN 76.752983
ALL 98.990951
AMD 418.261764
ANG 1.886428
AOA 960.004243
ARS 1106.259369
AUD 1.651855
AWG 1.889557
AZN 1.788749
BAM 1.955621
BBD 2.113407
BDT 127.178374
BGN 1.955621
BHD 0.395364
BIF 3099.316669
BMD 1.049754
BND 1.404372
BOB 7.232339
BRL 5.988536
BSD 1.046704
BTN 90.743704
BWP 14.43768
BYN 3.425487
BYR 20575.179075
BZD 2.102508
CAD 1.489549
CDF 3008.595443
CHF 0.944533
CLF 0.025765
CLP 988.699616
CNY 7.614958
CNH 7.620484
COP 4330.404127
CRC 530.75148
CUC 1.049754
CUP 27.818482
CVE 110.254921
CZK 25.039472
DJF 186.39296
DKK 7.464932
DOP 65.064052
DZD 141.992019
EGP 53.114144
ERN 15.746311
ETB 134.068744
FJD 2.411604
FKP 0.843639
GBP 0.834098
GEL 2.965597
GGP 0.843639
GHS 16.171522
GIP 0.843639
GMD 75.061456
GNF 9049.17275
GTQ 8.080261
GYD 218.989981
HKD 8.171926
HNL 26.684561
HRK 7.584553
HTG 136.95748
HUF 402.501982
IDR 16984.862814
ILS 3.723006
IMP 0.843639
INR 90.940721
IQD 1371.174651
IRR 44181.526931
ISK 147.018457
JEP 0.843639
JMD 165.28489
JOD 0.744805
JPY 159.879118
KES 135.387623
KGS 91.801394
KHR 4190.616906
KMF 491.918723
KPW 944.873173
KRW 1513.14736
KWD 0.323661
KYD 0.87222
KZT 520.392427
LAK 22747.920449
LBP 93732.131273
LKR 309.341721
LRD 208.82091
LSL 19.233242
LTL 3.099651
LVL 0.634986
LYD 5.135531
MAD 10.449845
MDL 19.573211
MGA 4930.549263
MKD 61.524376
MMK 3409.560155
MNT 3633.358171
MOP 8.391633
MRU 41.669191
MUR 48.782467
MVR 16.170137
MWK 1814.834093
MXN 21.311586
MYR 4.655138
MZN 67.083198
NAD 19.233242
NGN 1590.377723
NIO 38.516479
NOK 11.68044
NPR 145.189727
NZD 1.832527
OMR 0.403893
PAB 1.046704
PEN 3.888844
PGK 4.209615
PHP 60.565599
PKR 292.17359
PLN 4.169591
PYG 8247.24606
QAR 3.815851
RON 4.979407
RSD 117.119293
RUB 95.49127
RWF 1468.565748
SAR 3.937134
SBD 8.852278
SCR 15.09562
SDG 630.902531
SEK 11.227141
SGD 1.40573
SHP 0.864564
SLE 23.882294
SLL 22012.823144
SOS 598.145319
SRD 36.975526
STD 21727.789068
SVC 9.158163
SYP 13649.968557
SZL 19.229242
THB 35.416641
TJS 11.424756
TMT 3.674139
TND 3.314097
TOP 2.458633
TRY 38.052881
TTD 7.103351
TWD 34.306491
TZS 2721.451213
UAH 43.555118
UGX 3851.647893
USD 1.049754
UYU 45.465844
UZS 13599.756749
VES 65.060558
VND 26653.254935
VUV 129.815991
WST 2.97854
XAF 655.89704
XAG 0.03265
XAU 0.000364
XCD 2.837013
XDR 0.801427
XOF 655.89704
XPF 119.331742
YER 260.339349
ZAR 19.273278
ZMK 9449.04978
ZMW 29.491304
ZWL 338.020371
  • SCS

    -0.0700

    12.35

    -0.57%

  • NGG

    -0.5400

    60.73

    -0.89%

  • AZN

    -0.8700

    73.58

    -1.18%

  • BTI

    -0.7900

    38.82

    -2.04%

  • RBGPF

    63.5700

    63.57

    +100%

  • CMSC

    0.0900

    23.5

    +0.38%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    7.84

    +0.26%

  • GSK

    -0.3800

    36.17

    -1.05%

  • RIO

    0.0700

    63.36

    +0.11%

  • BCE

    0.1900

    23.82

    +0.8%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    8.36

    -0.84%

  • BP

    0.5100

    35

    +1.46%

  • BCC

    1.0300

    121.63

    +0.85%

  • RELX

    -0.8400

    51.07

    -1.64%

  • CMSD

    0.1872

    23.69

    +0.79%

  • JRI

    0.0435

    12.83

    +0.34%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

A.El-Sewedy--DT