Dubai Telegraph - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

EUR -
AED 4.35335
AFN 77.050797
ALL 96.66512
AMD 452.977132
ANG 2.121943
AOA 1087.00321
ARS 1715.259993
AUD 1.706088
AWG 2.136666
AZN 2.019869
BAM 1.955701
BBD 2.406579
BDT 146.012629
BGN 1.990709
BHD 0.449077
BIF 3539.921292
BMD 1.18539
BND 1.513224
BOB 8.256583
BRL 6.231008
BSD 1.19484
BTN 109.724461
BWP 15.634211
BYN 3.403228
BYR 23233.647084
BZD 2.403079
CAD 1.614917
CDF 2684.909135
CHF 0.911322
CLF 0.026011
CLP 1027.058063
CNY 8.240537
CNH 8.248946
COP 4350.080393
CRC 591.67013
CUC 1.18539
CUP 31.412839
CVE 110.259434
CZK 24.334287
DJF 212.769259
DKK 7.470097
DOP 75.226202
DZD 154.463202
EGP 55.903178
ERN 17.780852
ETB 185.61503
FJD 2.613371
FKP 0.865849
GBP 0.861444
GEL 3.194674
GGP 0.865849
GHS 13.089339
GIP 0.865849
GMD 86.533903
GNF 10484.470707
GTQ 9.164537
GYD 249.97738
HKD 9.259024
HNL 31.537408
HRK 7.536597
HTG 156.372106
HUF 381.328619
IDR 19883.141804
ILS 3.663335
IMP 0.865849
INR 108.693763
IQD 1565.320977
IRR 49934.560565
ISK 144.985527
JEP 0.865849
JMD 187.240547
JOD 0.840489
JPY 183.456955
KES 154.262212
KGS 103.662825
KHR 4804.757439
KMF 491.93733
KPW 1066.851144
KRW 1719.768532
KWD 0.36382
KYD 0.99575
KZT 600.939662
LAK 25713.701882
LBP 106998.998316
LKR 369.511346
LRD 215.369127
LSL 18.971842
LTL 3.500149
LVL 0.717031
LYD 7.497621
MAD 10.838453
MDL 20.096985
MGA 5339.730432
MKD 61.636888
MMK 2489.708718
MNT 4227.553379
MOP 9.608515
MRU 47.674593
MUR 53.852723
MVR 18.32658
MWK 2071.895403
MXN 20.70407
MYR 4.672854
MZN 75.580924
NAD 18.971842
NGN 1643.520192
NIO 43.96778
NOK 11.437875
NPR 175.559137
NZD 1.964681
OMR 0.458017
PAB 1.19484
PEN 3.994898
PGK 5.114742
PHP 69.837307
PKR 334.289724
PLN 4.215189
PYG 8003.59595
QAR 4.35638
RON 5.097064
RSD 117.394074
RUB 90.535429
RWF 1743.311992
SAR 4.447217
SBD 9.544303
SCR 17.203132
SDG 713.016537
SEK 10.580086
SGD 1.506161
SHP 0.88935
SLE 28.834661
SLL 24857.038036
SOS 682.865527
SRD 45.104693
STD 24535.182964
STN 24.498763
SVC 10.454472
SYP 13109.911225
SZL 18.966043
THB 37.225573
TJS 11.153937
TMT 4.148866
TND 3.433027
TOP 2.854135
TRY 51.401485
TTD 8.11259
TWD 37.456003
TZS 3076.744675
UAH 51.211415
UGX 4271.784345
USD 1.18539
UYU 46.367659
UZS 14607.262574
VES 410.075543
VND 30749.020682
VUV 140.814221
WST 3.213333
XAF 655.923887
XAG 0.014004
XAU 0.000244
XCD 3.203577
XCG 2.153391
XDR 0.815759
XOF 655.923887
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.508153
ZAR 19.134414
ZMK 10669.938133
ZMW 23.448816
ZWL 381.695147
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    1.3800

    83.78

    +1.65%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.05

    -0.17%

  • BCC

    0.5100

    80.81

    +0.63%

  • VOD

    -0.0600

    14.65

    -0.41%

  • RELX

    -0.3700

    35.8

    -1.03%

  • BCE

    0.3700

    25.86

    +1.43%

  • JRI

    0.1400

    13.08

    +1.07%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4300

    16

    -2.69%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.76

    +0.21%

  • RIO

    -4.1000

    91.03

    -4.5%

  • NGG

    0.2000

    85.27

    +0.23%

  • BTI

    0.4600

    60.68

    +0.76%

  • BP

    -0.1600

    37.88

    -0.42%

  • AZN

    0.1800

    92.77

    +0.19%

  • GSK

    0.9400

    51.6

    +1.82%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: Simon Wohlfahrt - AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

U.Siddiqui--DT